• teslasaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    4 days ago

    More like, want to have the same outcome as men at 80% of the effort.

    Or am I making a shitty effort meme that mimics OP? If you’re offended by this joke and not by OP, think of your own bias.

      • Agrivar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        The rambling nonsense of an incel manbaby. I should have been tipped off by the username, must have been sleepy.

        • teslasaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Oh dear. Another armchair phychologist that has never heard of Nikola Tesla. Had this nick since well before the car company started.

          Not that you deserve an explanation, but i saw a tesla coil as a kid and thought it was the coolest thing in the world. That and dinosaurs. Mix them up, draw a couple of pictures in paint on Windows 3.1 and boom: Enter to the teslasaur. Dino that shoots lightning.

    • Agrivar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      OP is a lighthearted joke that punches up, whereas yours was the opposite. Maybe think about your own biases, jackass.

        • parody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          We’re not a monolith but I am aware of some facts about us, like we’re statistically more likely to have shorter hair and take more dangerous jobs and commit violence—none of which offend me although the third one is incredibly disappointing.

          I believe I can see where you’re coming from. That said I would be interested in reading a bit more about your perspective on why this meme attacks men. Thank ya

          • Bgugi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Replace “men” with just about any protected class, and this statistic with another one that reflezcts comparably on that group.

              • Digit@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Yeah, (as I recall) that bigoted bias in USA gets even more damning when looking at the victim’s demographics instead.

                The Karens cry loudest, like they’re the only victims, or like they’re magnanimously mending the situation for everybody, when they’re already the 1%ers of victim pride.

          • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Lets take the worst black man in the world, and then apply his actions to the whole… Lets take the worst woman in the world, and then apply her actions to the whole… Lets take the worst… You get the idea. The lack of nuance in arguments is why a lot women think that men are all totally safe walking home at night. Worse, they think they are at great danger walking home at night, when the statistics say that they are in FAR more danger when they get home. And thats with underreporting of violence in the home.

            I mean, men are also victims 81% of the time according to the UNODC. We get 100% of the blame for the crimes, but 0% of the outcry for being the victims of that crime. And everyone seems real fucking comfortable being bigoted as fuck when it comes to men. And the actual number is 91% of violent crimes is done by men, but the % of men that are violent criminals is between 0.3 and 0.6%. So 100% of men globally endure hate and bigotry because of the actions of less than 1% of the total. Does that sound like “punching up” to you?

            • Digit@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Hush you. Men are supposed to just take it. Women and children first.

              No emotional support for men. Keep the demands on them. Keep berating them for striving to meet those demands. Keep taking away their ability to support a family. Keep demanding them to. Keep judging men with the hasty generalisation fallacy, ignoring the statistical outliers. Keep men dying younger. Keep saying “patriarchy” like all men are all advantaged rulers. ;-}

      • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Don’t women think it as a bit demeaning to think that they’re universally and categorically below men when it comes to jokes?

      • teslasaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Is it really punching up though? The victim complex is part of the bias, jackass.

        Although it might have been funnier to make it 20% effort.

    • Fleur_@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Man you need to be more concerned with your jokes being funny than being offensive

      • teslasaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        4 days ago

        Good, so you agree that OP made a shitty meme too? I just made the same joke but reversed it.

        • kurwa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Men are so butt hurt lol can’t even take a joke without crying like a little baby 😂

    • answersplease77@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Studies have shown that males are jailed with 8:2 ratio compared to their female counterparts!

      We demand equal prison female population for equal criminal efforts! Just because I’m a woman, does not make me an inferior criminal! lmao…!

  • Krudler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    In terms of frequency, women are significantly worse than men; men more damage per physical act of violence.

    In terms of emotional and psychological violence, women are so far ahead of the race they disappeared over the horizon.

    • Agrivar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      4 days ago

      “ROPS (Roll-Over Protective Structure) and FOPS (Falling Object Protective Structure) are safety features integrated into heavy machinery to protect operators.”

      For everyone else unfamiliar with those acronyms!

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      Could be in and out of the machine often at a site/plant that requires it outside and doesn’t bother to take it off?

      The reality is that it’s probably a photoshoot

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yup. Beat me to it. In and out, easiest place to keep it, still on your head.

      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think the brand-newness of her clothes and hard hat, as well as full makeup, indicate that it’s a photo shoot and she is not actually an equipment operator.

    • TaterTot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      I can just imagine it now. Me, in my little hard hat, on a big ol excavator, paying no mind to the ROPS/FOPS overhead, completely safe from all the debris that wants nothing more than to crack open my noggin, excavating to my hearts content!

      Oh what a day that would be!

    • Formfiller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      You do realize everyone has to wear a hard hat on a construction site by osha safety standards right?

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I, for one, for sure, would be grateful for the hard hat in a ROPS event. Even a FOPS event.

        • Formfiller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Sure it is a redundant protection but as a longtime journey level construction worker I can tell you you still have to wear a hard hat on construction sites anywhere on site

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                No offense but we just moved from everyone on a construction site needs one to the construction sites in your area needs one.

                I wouldn’t have disagreed with you if you started with that.

                • Formfiller@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  I know cal osha requires everyone at all times needs a hard hat on a construction site. I don’t work small private residential cal osha may be more strict on bigger jobs but it is an osha requirement here so I assumed it was a federal osha policy. I know it was definitely covered in my osha 10 and OSHA 30 courses. I was also an instructor for my trade union and this is what is taught in the nationwide union curriculum and yes any heavy equipment we use we have to wear a hard hat while operating nationwide In my trade.

        • Fizz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          They are above the rules. Unless you’re on one of the cranes with the security cameras

            • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              But just because you are talking on a global forum doesn’t mean you can’t talk about your personal experience

                • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  What do you mean? We’re just describing what we see in the picture and how it compares to our lived experience.

                  Does your country have an osha or can people go to construction sites without hardhats, or do you have a regulating body but hardhats aren’t required / the rules aren’t enforced?

                  Saying OSHA is like saying Kleenex to us, we don’t even realize it is a brand name. It has become the generic term in our en_us language anyway.

    • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      4 days ago

      How so? They can both do 80%. This will increase the total number of crimes to 160% but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to pay to protect equality, the second amendment and the free world.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s not how maths works.

        [Excuse me while I “mansplain”] But if women want to increase their violent crimes to match men’s, they need to increase by an additional 300%. This would result in a total increase of violent crimes of 60% more violent crime.

        C’mon girls! Try harder!

        Do your part to achieve equality!

        Then maybe men can cease being expected to open doors, put toilet seats down, put women and children first, die in wars, buy dinner and flowers, carry all the heavy things, fend off attackers, fix everything, [(quietly)] die younger, thrive without emotional support, be sole provider as a trad-hubby gentleman sigma-male feminist-ally bad-boy softie stoic emoting funny but only in a specific way and tall but not too tall and looking good with a six-pack without spending time working on it and whatever else in the cluster of impossible contradictions, alone.

  • Beesbeesbees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    I am just a 5’ honey badger waiting for my moment. Closest call was that time Jehovah witnesses peered into my car while I was alone at night outside of a store. Turns out they are easily frightened when you hold your car horn down long enough though.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    >makes ragebait post for men

    >laughs at men getting ragebaited

    >pretends like ragebaiting people is progressive in any way

  • BilSabab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    what’s unnerving is that there lots of POW reports that indicate that women showcase far more cruelty towards female POWs compared to men.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      You only have one countrr argument, dammit and you’re going to use it!

      It’s specious and fallacious but it’s all you’ve got!

    • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Quoting crime statistics based on race, like the old “13/50” trope, is often used to enforce racist notions that minority groups are inherently bad people. It’s punching down at marginalized people.

      This meme, at least as I see it, is the opposite. It’s satirizing the usual crap from the anti-feminist crowd claiming that women are inherently inferior. It’s punching up at sexist men.

      • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Statistics put men globally as being 81% of the victims of violent crime. And the perpetrators of that crime being less than 1% of the male population. So to put it another way, youre making the same argument as racists when they claim that all black guys sell drugs because some black guy sold them a joint one time.

        This is just yet another in a long line of “men bad” memes, in an online society that accepts and celebrates bigotry.

      • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        So…statistics are only valid when they promote your ideals?

        Or is it that, in your mind, the stats that don’t run parallel with your ideals have obviously been misinterpreted or fudged?

        Just trying to figure out your stance on statistical data.

        • garth@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Statistics are just numbers. What matters is how they are used. Anyone who has studied stats knows that it’s common to craft misleading conclusions from real data.

          • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            3 days ago

            So what is the “right” way to use them?

            So long as they are helping the “downtrodden”* it’s ok to see the numbers differently?

            I have studied statistics. In my studies I learned that numbers do not lie, people lie. And, as was stated before, people can manipulate numbers to match their narrative.

            I’ve seen studies published as “fact” just because the author manipulated the numbers to match their findings.

            This is what we should base our outlook on?

            *in this instance, “downtrodden” refers to the person or group deemed savable by those who are looking to be a savior.

            • Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’ve seen critically reviewed papers that mouth breathers like you are taking up too much oxygen. You should look at yourself in the mirror. How much does it hurt?

        • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Stats are valid when they are used in the proper context and are not being misrepresented. For example, Black and Native American people account for a disproportionate number of drowning deaths in the US. But it would be irresponsible to simply conclude that those groups are inherently bad swimmers. Just like the way the 13/50 trope is irresponsibly used to imply non-whites are inherently more prone to criminal behavior.

          All that aside, this meme isn’t attacking men. It’s attacking sexist tropes used against women.

          • teslasaur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            3 days ago

            All that aside, this meme isn’t attacking men. It’s attacking sexist tropes used against women.

            Nah, it’s a sexist joke. But it’s funny because “Haha, men bad”.

            It’s equivalent to making a joke like this: “Men do care about their feelings. Feeling their dick being sucked”

              • teslasaur@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Which part? The fact that OP made a sexist joke, or the part where Lemmy(in general) is vitriolic in response to certain statistics?

  • Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Everybody knows only black males such as myself commit crimes… : exits scene left when the black face starts to sweat off:

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s because you’re measuring physical violence, not psychological. We skate under the radar once again.