Especially teens and college students

Source: i’m a college student

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Once something becomes statusy, is seems pretty rare that it ever stops. You can’t outcompete Apple at being Apple, and to stay exclusive they can just keep prices up.

    It genuinely was revolutionary when it came out. I guess they managed to leverage that into being a luxury brand, when no further world-breaking innovations were forthcoming. The only thing those really have to worry about is staying relevant, as opposed to going the way of fine china and monocles.

    • ChexMax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s nuts, you’ve never heard anyone tease about green chat bubbles? Never heard the joke “I don’t talk to poor people”? Didn’t see all that stuff blow up extra when the air pods came out?

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s not the phone, it’s your age bracket. You can say the same thing for other stuff like shoes/clothes, cars, etc. It’s peer/societal pressure, FOMO, and other factors that teenagers and young adults feel are important. People care less when they get older. My iphone is a utility device to me, and I’ll keep using it until it dies or security updates stop, instead of upgrading every year.

    • lemming741@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      And those demographics are very susceptible to marketing and peer pressure. The chat bubble colors are designed to make you think of alternative phone users as outcasts. Used to be the same with photos and videos in MMS.

      By your late 20s most people don’t give a shit about being labeled outcast, but by then you’re locked into their ecosystem.

      • felsiq@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is definitely one reason for their design, and Apple is shit for that, but the primary reason and the one that many iphone haters miss or trivialize is that SMS/MMS are absolutely fucking trash. There has to be a distinction because if you’re using imessage and relying on all your messages being e2e encrypted and your photos/videos not being compressed to shit, it’s important to get a blatant visual indicator when that’s not actually the case.

        I’m not trying to downplay apple’s bullshit social engineering about this, that really is fucked up, but this gets misconstrued all the time as irrational users being upset by green bubbles when to (many of) those users it’s actually a huge downgrade in security and functionality that they’re reacting to.

          • felsiq@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah exactly what I mean, any good UI will have to distinguish between things that are actually different in relevant ways. I’m less of a fan of this UI personally, cuz if both are using sms for a bit you probably lose your visual reminder of the difference, but people focusing on the visual indicator existing at all are missing the point imo.

  • Raoul Duke@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think originally because they used to be only for AT&T customers and were the most expensive, then android started flooding the market with cheap shitty phones.

    • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is the real reason. The iphone was the original tablet-like smart phone and it was marketed as a premium offering and as a result has always enjoyed that status.

      Android was second to market and a competitor to the iphone. Because every manufacturer wanted to make a tablet-like phone, they copied the iphone’s style and made hundreds of shitty knockoffs over the years that effectively bolstered the iphone’s premium status. Yes there are flagship android phones made by Samsung and LG that cost more than the most expensive iphone - but they are loaded with bloatware and bootlocked so you dont get updates and is held back by garbage so it works like shit in only a few years. So even the premium options are shit. The google pixels are good hardware but they’re made by a company that makes every one of their trillions of pennies by spying on you.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Can’t be any other purpose in my personal opinion. Android is better, to me.

  • Libb@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    I see mine for what it is. A phone. And a serious threat to my privacy. (I’m well into my 50s, if this matters)

    • YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      If you’re looking for privacy, I highly recommend (weirdly enough) a Google Pixel. With GrapheneOS it’s way more secure and private than basically anything else on the market.

      • Libb@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Thx (a lot) for the suggestion.

        I’ve been considering what will be my next phone so, yeah, I’ve toyed with this idea. But I’m also averse to renewing my devices needlessly (reducing my e-waste production). I kept my last iPhone 8 years or so and only changed it because I broke it and it was way too much to have it fixed. So, when comes time to renew this one I’m not sure Google will still allow Android users to change their OS for a more privacy respecting one, but if it still allow it, it’s most probably what I will do :)

    • alecsargent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I disagree, kids are taught by adults, so whatever they are learning its from their teachers and families. In my experience I have seen more adults give a status symbols to Apple products than children.

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It is still cliqueish even if they don’t do it intentionally when you have things like they assume you have apple things like the iPhone charger( deprecated now) or airdrop.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      I may consider “many adults”… I still get grief about it from older adults (I’m talking people in their 40’s and older). Though either of us could be correct.

      These are people who can’t be bothered with how things work, but… are amazing at what they do. So it’s an interesting circumstance to observe, and I haven’t come to any strong conclusions.

    • cRazi_man@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Bullshit. Adults absolutely care. It’s human nature to try to project your status in the social hierarchy. That takes different forms and may instead be projecting status with a Stanley flask or Canada Goose jacket, or whatever.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Most adults don’t use their iphones as status symbols. Look at 10 random adults iphones and over 9 of them will be damaged.

        I’ve managed iphones for hundreds of people and only encountered a few that care at all.

        BlackBerry holdovers would be a different discussion though.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Soooo, adults?

          Don’t pretend we’ve ever been better than that as a species. The exact form it takes changes (who does ermine fur anymore?) but the idea stays the same.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Don’t pretend we’ve ever been better than that as a species.

            Will you make the argument that people who refuse to follow such fashion trends are somehow inhuman?

            If you are unwilling to make such an argument, I will not accept your premise that this is a trait of the “species”.

            What you (and the parent comment) are describing is a characteristic of certain childish behaviors, philosophies and cultures.

            The sophomoric behavior of these geriatric children is not an indictment of humanity in general.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              More like, most common allele within the species.

              What’s the culture where people don’t covet meaningless status symbols? Even hunter gatherer cultures have generated examples, and they can’t own much more than they can carry.

              • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                What’s the culture where people don’t covet meaningless status symbols?

                While there are numerous examples of such philosophies and cultures around the globe, I don’t actually need to identify such a culture to demonstrate my point.

                If one can remain human without engaging in this behavior, this behavior is not a characteristic of the human condition.

                The question before you is whether the members of such a hypothetical culture are inhuman specifically because they do not engage in that covetous behavior.

                The abhorrent behaviors being described are conditions of ideas held by certain members of the species. The species is not lessened by the rejection of such ideas. The “certain members” are lessened by their adherence to those ideas.

                • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  That’s an interesting way of looking at it. Don’t you think there’s a human nature that’s not strictly learned? It seems to me that history repeats way more than it should if we were that good at changing.

                  Like, obviously, there’s variance at the individual level, but it seems like the population as a whole has striking similarities, regardless of where you travel or what era in history you’re reading about.

                  While there are numerous examples of such philosophies and cultures around the globe

                  Dovetailing into that, a philosophy is not a culture. Philosophies at best sightly influence cultures, as actually practiced, and even that is overblown. Since this is Lemmy, I’ll use the example of how well Western Christians follow teachings about not being greedy or whatever. Other cultures have similar facets.

  • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t. I just use the phone because it works well with my laptop. My previous one was all banged up and scratched, so I wouldn’t really call it a status symbol.

    I don’t really care about status though. My friends are a bunch of misfits. If it bothers you that people are using something as a status symbol, perhaps you’re more concerned about status than you realize. I’d love to just advise you to stop caring about that but it’s not that easy. Status seeking is a pretty common, normal behaviour.

  • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Uh, I don’t. It’s just a phone I use. That’s it.

    Teenagers and students are just that; teenagers and students. Very often they care about ‘status symbol’ but also sometimes they don’t care.

    I would recommend to stop generalizing.

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Tribalism didn’t end when civilization started. Anyone not in the tribe is lesser, because the alternative would mean your tribe is lesser.

    More specific to an iPhone, if you have one, you can do all the social iPhone things like FaceTime. Don’t have one? You can’t FaceTime, so there is a social friction or impediment to socializing. Then there is the “othering” of the green bubble and blue bubble thing. You can’t share photos or videos the same if you don’t have an iPhone. Since we are in a digital age and less physically present, not being able to digitally socialize the same way also inhibits socialization.

    All of this is by design. Apple intentionally creates an ecosystem that will excert social pressure on people to buy their products so they can be part of the group like their friends.