The move comes as Apple removed ICEBlock after direct pressure from U.S. Department of Justice officials and signals a broader crackdown on ICE-spotting apps.
It’s not a suggestion for an alternative.
Sideloading is not even blocked: unblocked apps remain sideloadable.
Sideloading is not “fucking anti-property-rights loaded language” & the word existed a while before Android OS.
They’re just being uninformed drama-queens as usual.
It is a fairly loaded word, implying it’s an alternative method of loading data to the primary, more actively vendor-supported method. Those methods you previously mentioned are actively subverting the primary application install methods (Google Play) and are 1 minor software update from being completely axed. Name-calling an opposing “they” is not quite productive.
Sideload wasn’t loaded language before Android OS and still isn’t: it’s a bogus, overreactive claim.
All of them are valid install methods.
Developers will always need a way to load their experimental apps not yet suitable for release: they won’t block the methods they need to do that.
Clear use cases for casual users exist for
deterring them from installing software by bad actors that’s known to be malicious
verifying non-malicious software hasn’t been modified possibly maliciously before installing it.
“They” are drama-queens, because despite legitimate use cases to address actual problems posing high-cost risks to users (even as Google turns out to be a shitty authority) & clear documentation that power users can still install any package they want, they choose to catastrophize.
You mean “installing normally.” “Sideloading” is fucking anti-property-rights loaded language.
Do you have a better, simple word for what they’re banning?
installing?
downloading and installing programs.
But they’re not banning downloading and installing programs. What are they blocking, specifically?
regular installs of apps by unverified or suspended developers
they can still be installed by
adbwhenever I point this out to the drama queens here, they get hissy
Yes. Just looking for a simple 1-3 word term that encapsulates this
It’s not a suggestion for an alternative. Sideloading is not even blocked: unblocked apps remain sideloadable. Sideloading is not “fucking anti-property-rights loaded language” & the word existed a while before Android OS.
They’re just being uninformed drama-queens as usual.
It is a fairly loaded word, implying it’s an alternative method of loading data to the primary, more actively vendor-supported method. Those methods you previously mentioned are actively subverting the primary application install methods (Google Play) and are 1 minor software update from being completely axed. Name-calling an opposing “they” is not quite productive.
“They” is now a dirty word?
Sideload wasn’t loaded language before Android OS and still isn’t: it’s a bogus, overreactive claim.
All of them are valid install methods. Developers will always need a way to load their experimental apps not yet suitable for release: they won’t block the methods they need to do that.
Clear use cases for casual users exist for
“They” are drama-queens, because despite legitimate use cases to address actual problems posing high-cost risks to users (even as Google turns out to be a shitty authority) & clear documentation that power users can still install any package they want, they choose to catastrophize.
They’re banning programs from being installed unless the installation has their consent
They’re banning non google-drmed app installs
Isn’t there somebody you forgot to ask?
“Ownership.”
Loading non-playstore apps?
What do you call installing an application on a computer?
I say “I
apt-getit”Good point. Wild how these ghouls have normalized their bullshit language.