• BrickEater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    Debating a data center IMO is the same as debating a Nazis right to exist. They should’ve been stopped before they could get going and now that its too late to stop them we just gotta kill them instead.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    I recently watched a video about the first electronic synthesizer. It was built in 1897, and was housed in the basement of an entire city block in NYC. Several decades later, and it would fit in a suitcase, with far more functionality. It worked, but it was huge and unwieldly, to the point of being completely impractical. It needed to wait until the technology caught up to it, and made it a truly viable instrument, and not just a concept.

    Data Centers are like that 1897 synthesizer. It works, sure, but at what cost? It’s expensive in every way, from the building costs, the energy costs, the environmental costs, etc. We have a concept and a prototype, but not a truly viable product yet. Maybe in a decade or two, with a proper goal in mind, we can get there, but right now, Data Centers are just that big, dumb synthesizer that takes up a city block.

    • BrickEater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      Ah but that’s where you’re mistaken. The electronic Synthesizer actually had a use. Data centers are a waste the whole way around, and they always will be.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Because as humans we are insanely stupid. I think we all know the answer. Money is why Arizona. We don’t do what’s right. We do what is cheap and effective. It just happens that sometimes that is right too.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This will help fighting the global colding we’ve had going on… wait, something’s off. Am I reading the charts upside down again?

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Once again I am shocked that you always have these big ass heat exchangers on these data centers but no talk of even trying to use some of the waste heat to offset the power use.

    • mack@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      my crazy ass idea since 2015:

      let’s install mini data centers on residential buildings:

      • use excess heat to get hot water for pavement heating in winter and get hot water for domestic usage
      • buildings get free high speed fiber
      • local edge servers
      • employ local people for maintenance

      cons:

      • management hell, but if small teams get split locally in quarters/towns then I don’t see problems
    • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Waste heat is high entropy alredy. You can’t extract any meaningful energy out of it.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Ah yes, famously we have never been able to do anything with heat energy…

        • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s not my fault you don’t understand physics and think that all heat=free energy. You can’t extract shit without big temperature difference.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yeah if only you had enough excess heat in one area to increase the local temperature of an already very hot place by 4 degrees.

            • Kptkrunch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              58 minutes ago

              If you plug the numbers into the Carnot equation, it looks like the maximum theoretical efficiency of a thermoelectric generator or heat engine operating at that temperature gradient is about 0.75%. And, I could be wrong, but my assumption would be any attempt to reclaim that energy would slow its exchange and potentially bottleneck a cooling system to some extent.

              • BrickEater@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                31 minutes ago

                I mean good, we should do everything possible to make these data centers as unnefficient as they are unnecessary.

            • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              4 degrees Fahrenheit is nothing. For all practical energy production puropses it’s worthless

    • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Americans simply don’t give a shit.

      No, whiny clown about to reply, I don’t care if you’re “one of the good ones.” You STILL don’t give a shit.

      • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Okay wiz, I’ll bite. While I’m working 60 hours a week, raising awareness online, and attending City council meetings, what else would you like me to fucking do? Mail them a pipe of dynamite?

      • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Hey don’t lump me in with those whiny clowns! I’m a whiny clown in a clown suit. Damn foreigners making extremely generalized assumptions about us /s

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They are wasteful on purpose. they could have closed circuit cooling systems where they condense the water from the vapor and reuse it. But they are a giant middle finger to all of us.

      • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Nah, evaporation removes multiple times more heat than regular air cooling. It’s because water has high specific heat

      • NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Pretty sure most modern data centers are using closed loop cooling or refrigeration. Not evaporative cooling.

        You can’t condense the water either that would defeat the point of evaporating it in the first place. Closed loop liquid cooling does not involve boiling or evaporation. You are just pumping a liquid around a circuit. It’s not just water either it’s more like a car antifreeze.

        • KnitWit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Got any info to back that up? Here’s a screenshot from page 39 of the US Data Center Energy Usage Report, which shows the use of closed loop systems (which they call dry cooling) as one of the smallest percentages of cooling types used. Pretty sure you’ve got it completely backwards on the types of cooling used, and I know for a fact the massive Amazon data center out in Oregon uses evaporative, because you can’t drink the water there as a result.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            The laws of thermodynamics? Can’t create or destroy energy and overall entropy increases over time. A closed loop (or any cooling system) just moves heat away from the hot thing. So yes, they can be used as much as any other cooling system but it won’t stop the issue of “generating lots of heat”. That heat still needs to go somewhere. Dumping it into the atmosphere might be the best option if there’s nothing in the area that needs heat. Should probably build them next to steel plants or something like that. Then a closed loop would be better.

            • NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I never said it fixed the issue of generating heat. Heat isn’t really a major problem as far as I am concerned. I thought we were talking about water use.

            • KnitWit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              ? OP was claiming that the majority of data centers use closed loop/refrigeration systems and I was pointing out that US data shows the vast majority use evaporative cooling. They posted a few comments pushing that idea which is why I refuted that. I’m not sure what the point you’re trying to make is in regards to those two statements. I’m not disputing the accuracy of what you’re saying, just unsure of where you’re going with it.

              • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                Thought your request to back it up was in response to the parent comment saying that condensing the water defeats the purpose rather than the first paragraph.

          • NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Why would they call closed loop liquid cooling “dry cooling”? Unless they explicitly said that then I don’t believe you to be honest.

            Evaporative cooling wouldn’t make the water undrinkable unless something has gone very wrong. So I don’t think what you are saying about Oregan is true either.

            This is also only representative of the USA, not worldwide. I get that much of the world doesn’t have many datacenters compared to the USA, but you at least have to include China and the EU.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Just a talking point in an investors report. The more I read on these centers the more I am convinced they are not built to work.

        • NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          The guy you are replying to doesn’t actually know jack about data centers. Plenty do use closed loop cooling which doesn’t involve evaporating water. It’s only a minority that use evaporative cooling. Power stations are more likely to use evaporative cooling (hence big towers with steam clouds) than datacenters are. They also use far more cooling water than datacenters do. Both pale in comparison to agriculture and other uses.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Some people making datacenter looks into way to recycle the extra heat, some uses it to heat local area (willingly). But all of this costs more than just, dumping it out, I guess.

      • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If Phoenix has heavy Industries, piped steam is often useful. There’s also central heating (just hot water eg for cooking, bathing, dishwasher etc.), however this requires prior design.

        Then there’s a better option to have the chimney higher up so the hot air doesn’t impact downstream.

        It’s not rocket science but it’s not free of cost either

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It doesn’t set a precedent at all. It’s always been like this.

          Now just more people are being effected by it and in places that people actually give a fuck about. So it’s news now.

          • Omnipitaph@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Mind throwing out a source? Having some trouble searching for other places that have experienced this kinda thing, with how fucked search has gotten. All I can find are articles about company towns, which don’t feel like what you’re referring to.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Its a travesty, but in that case a little more strange. The blame is not just on the power company but also the local government, the company was bought in 2009 and told the community it would be winding down providing power in the area. The local government got a few extensions but now they have “better” customers they are not going to give them any more. So for many years the area knew it had this issue to deal with but like a lot of americans just sat on their asses and said nothing could be done.

          As to why this is allowed, simple, it is a power company existing in a system where profit is the sole factor in anything.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I think part of the issue is they did not really try, it looks like they just assumed things would stay the same. The other part is how would they get another provider? I assume they could get one but for how much more?

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Free market economy. You could technically do similar with nordpool. Set up a ridiculous power consumer and watch everyone’s prices go up.

  • totoro@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Data centers are inherently an important part of our society, and they’re going to become even more necessary going forward,”

    God, fuck this shit

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Right?

      Like, says who and on what historical basis? People said similar shit about crypto and we all know how that turned out.

          • NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            21 hours ago

            The majority of datacenters and datacenter power consumption are not for AI. Before AI no one cared about datacenters. Still no one cares about datacenters that already existed and make up the majority of datacenters. I don’t understand it. Is this just manufactured outrage?

            • TronBronson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              People hate data centers because they are being forced into our communities without our consent. Consent. Consent.consent

              • NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Most datacenters are not in urban communities they are in industrial zones.

                You also don’t need the consent of other people to build things on land you own. Get out of here with this shit.

              • NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                18 hours ago

                What do you want me to put together? Why don’t you just come out and say what you mean instead of beating around the bush?

        • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          So running a community forum on a decade old laptop, or someone using a hand-me-down phone to watch videos are equal to openAI’s stargate hyperscaler?

          We don’t classify a laptop a data centre just because it was repurposed as a web server, and furthermore, devices are so powerful today that you could probably do the same on a smart watch.

          Either you don’t know what a data centre is, or are intentionally skewing the definition of “data centre” to fit your snarky reply.

          • NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            YouTube requires enormous amounts of data center hardware. Do you have any idea how much video data they injest, transcode, and distribute in even just an hour or a minute? It’s not very economical to run actually and they had major problems even breaking even.

            Most large Lemmy instances run on cloud services nowadays. So they rely on a datacenter somewhere. I am well aware you can self-host - I have done so for multiple things including AI models and tools - but that’s a minority of Lemmy users. Most are using public instances which are hosted on servers in the cloud. In fact if you read the deployment guide for Lemmy it is meant to be deployed using cloud native technology.

            You also don’t need a whole Stargate to host one users AI usage. You don’t even need a whole server. Typically AI servers process requests from multiple users simultaneously. The actual marginal cost of each user is relatively small, hence why people can and do run local AI models.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s funny how the last decade or so we were always told to save water and ditch the car, you know, be as environmentally friendly as possible only for big companies to come along and basically do the opposite; again and again.

    The world is going to shit and everyone knows it, but money talks I guess… I can’t fucking take it anymore.

      • Omnipitaph@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Every state has a website like this one: https://sos.oregon.gov/business/Pages/find.aspx

        And for the low low price of free, you will know their business address, their mailing address, and the personal address of the most important people in any company you look up.

        I do not support doxxing of residents and civilians, but lets be real here. Wealthy corps and wealthy people are in charge. People.

    • BlindPenguin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Those aren’t the same people. More often than not, the people who fuck the environment the most, tend to finance parties that want to end any environmental protection.

        • VonReposti@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Germany seems fine on some level, at least you don’t have a wannabe dictator. What concerns me is that the cold war border is still very visible on political maps.

        • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          The tech oligarchs sided with the magats because the Democrats said they were going to treat AI like the Manhattan project, for safety. One of the biggest reasons the US election cycle went the way it did was because the Democrats said they weren’t going to allow this.

      • Renat@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        In America both parties are shit and they have some people that aspire to some kinds of genocide that I don’t support. In my country(Poland) there are more parties, but each one have at least one politician that aspire to genocide.

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The unceasing demonic entities do not have a soul. It is folly to attribute human emotions such as the survival of the human race to a destruction wraith as if it had any other drive than the gluttonous desperate need for growth we have all assigned and written contracts with them, while pretending we have no individual choice. There are so many alternate governments beside rampant hypercapitalist greed slaughter mode that could give humans some power over the immortal global hatemachines that are burying our race as a game. But what do I know, it is normalized by usa to let engines of hell have lifeblood lawyers lobby and extract any value from all corners of society because of “growth”. I think every human knows the difference in their bones, between prosperity and growth. Yet some humans even has as their jobs to try to trick in any way possible the targets they only want prosperity. When they know its growth, its goal is to grow and consume us entirely. Then when we have been eradicated, I guess they will just wither away not even caring who won any more. It’s disgusting to think about. The lobbying lawyer servants that makes sure they are unstoppable by their masters exponential obliteration march. I think it is vile that you allow these hungering spectres prey on the world under the guise of prosperity. Hypercapitalism is an extremist and occult form of government. You don’t even seem to react to the political jesters dance. Entranced by their games? By the allure of their lies? Bleh. It is easy to mistake prosperity for growth. I understand. But now you know. One is poison.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Seems hard to believe that those would outweigh the like 30 degree average temperature difference of building it some place like Glasgow Montana.