• Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    He’s not that important. They aren’t touching guns. It’d be great if it happens, but remember, Sandy Hook didn’t change anything.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sandy Hook didn’t bring change because they don’t care about protecting children. They do care about protecting themselves however.

      • harmbugler@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yes, this is one of their own. Though it reminds me of their Epstein problem where they have tied their own shoelaces together on an issue.

        Who am I kidding, watch them vacillate for a minute on the number of guns there should be, before deciding on “more”.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not great if it happens, it’s impossible

      Let’s be real, we have more guns than citizens. To change that fact would be the work of a generation

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      This will be used to push the “LGBTQ+ people are mental illness and can’t have guns” argument. It doesn’ matter if the shooter is queer, or even found; this incident is going to be used in the rhetoric.

      They’re coming for someone’s guns. It just won’t be their own.