• ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    The last panel’s wording insults the audience’s intelligence, imo. “I’d get arrested” would be enough to get the joke across.

  • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Is this just a throwaway joke or a ‘hidden propaganda’ joke? I’ve seen this sentiment twice on Lemmy.

    Asking as an American.

    • Redacted@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      The UK have no freedom of speech laws. Im also American so this is just what ive gathered from other people but apparently if you say anything in support of palestine or other topics you get arrested. Hopefully a brit chimes in.

      • then_three_more@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        if you say anything in support of palestine

        You can say stuff in support of Palestine just fine.

        You can’t be in support of abspecific group called Palestine Action because they’ve been designated a terrorist organisation. Whether that group warrants being defined as a terrorist group based on what they’ve done so far (obviously there could be intelligence that the public aren’t privy to) is dubious.

        • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Seems like the key is to literally just omit the word “action”, and any symbols or logos that the group may use.

          Fucking rules-lawyer their asses.

          • then_three_more@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Or just support a different group that is calling for freedom for Palestine but hasn’t broken into a military air base and vandalised some planes.

            A lot of the people that have been arrested aren’t protesting in for Palestine alone, they’re protesting that that specific organisation shouldn’t be considered terrorism and the overreach of the law that has been used. Their whole intention was to be arrested. That was the protest.

        • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Palestine Action’s biggest crime is that they were effective. Their actions forced the closure of two Israeli weapons factories and forced Barclay’s Bank to divest from the manufacturer (Elbit Systems). Direct action (sabotaging the means of production that support the genocide) fucking works.

      • Nester@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        We have ‘freedom of expression’ as outlined in the 1998 Human Rights Act. The HRA says that we are free to express ourselves as we see fit so long as it is within the confines of the law.

        We have relatively strong hate speech laws as outlined in the 1986 Public Order Act, which makes it an offense to “[make] threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviours that causes, or is likely to cause, another person harassment, alarm or distress” and “language that encourages terrorism”.

        Recently a non-violent pro-Palestine, activist group (Palestine Action) was prescribed as a terrorist group, making it illegal to support any of their actions.

        • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          This is very informative. I was worried, due to missing context, that it may be a consorted effort to destroy faith in their democratic protections. Say, from Russian cyber propaganda farms.

          • thejoker954@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            Did you even skim those entries?

            Where is the violence? All those entries amount to vandilism and maybe criminal mischief.

            • 8uurg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              To play the advocate of the devil: vandalism does meet the first definition of violence here: Behavior or treatment in which physical force is exerted for the purpose of causing damage or injury. (Emphasis mine) It does not need to target a person.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 days ago

            Are these entries in the Wiki false?

            Nope, but they don’t describe any violence. Violence is harming PEOPLE, not damaging property.

            If you think that daubing weapons of genocide with red paint is violence, let alone makes you a fucking TERRORIST, you really need to reexamine your values.

          • Nester@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 days ago

            They’re not false, but they don’t show the whole picture, as one paragraph seldom can.

            If you are referring the action in Runcorn, of which they are said to have “stormed, scaled, and occupied” the premises of the military equipment manufacturer at 4.30am, I wouldn’t say that counts as violence. I would say that violence is typically considered harm to a person or people, not windows and drones.

        • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          [a law] says that we are free to express ourselves as we see fit so long as it is within the […] law” looks like a tautology to me, is that phrasing accurate to the HRA?

          • SalaciousBCrumb@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s more that you can’t be arrested for shit that isn’t illegal simply because they don’t like you saying.

            Sure they could make it illegal, but you’re at least given some time and warning.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          We have ‘freedom of expression’

          The HRA says that we are free to express ourselves as we see fit so long as it is within the confines of the law.

          That’s only freedom of expression for those who make the laws.

    • Ozymandias88@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      A couple of years ago the previous government added restrictions to peaceful protest to say they couldn’t be too disruptive.

      Early this year some numptys from the group Palestinian Action broke into a military base and threw paint over military aircraft. The current government classified Palestinian Action as a terrorist group in response to this. I think the general sentiment in the UK is it’s fucking stupid to break into a military base and damage equipment and it’s luckily they weren’t shot, however it definitely doesn’t meet the criteria for terrorism. The classification is currently being challenged in court.

      Meanwhile people are still free to protest the genocide in Palestine but not free to support the group Palestinian Action and so people who are going to protests with signs that say Palestinian Action are getting arrested.

      Hundreds of people have been arrested since for showing support for Palestinian Action specifically. And also 1 guy for supporting Plasticine Action (Stop motion animators against AI)

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        The entire reason for a protest is to be too disruptive! You have to be loud and obnoxious if you want to make a change.

        Fucking Brits, lol. Too polite to even protest properly.

          • 3abas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            They’re gonna vote for the party that started the genocide next time, and that’ll fix everything.

            They’ve leaned nothing.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Capitalism is a worldwide scourge that will homogenize every nation under it’s new and improved model of luxury, bluetooth compatible, AI-powered Jackboot™ with over 2700 positive reviews! Free shipping if ordered within the next 6 hours!

            • Eldritch@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              It’s not “capitalism”. It’s just an ideology like Leninism. Ideologies rely on ideal conditions and circumstances to function well. When those ideologies disregard or outright neglect human nature. As both those do. They have and always will degrade and fail.

    • ShadowRam@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      throwaway joke made by an American not understanding basic hate speech laws.

          • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            You sure about that?

            https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8de6rq37v5o

            Police have arrested 474 people at a demonstration in London in support of banned group Palestine Action.

            The Metropolitan Police said 466 protesters were arrested for supporting the group, five for assaults on police officers, two for public order offences, and one for a racially aggravated offence.

            • ShadowRam@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              5 days ago

              I mean, do I have to spell out the different between ‘Palestine’ and ‘Palestine Action’ ?

              I can’t make the claim I know Palestine Action,

              But its noted they are now a ‘Terrorist Organization’

              While I can’t claim whether that group ‘should’ or ‘should-not’ be officially recognized as a ‘Terrorist Organization’

              Those people were arrested for supporting a Terrorist Organization. Not for Supporting Palestine.

        • hakase@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          It’s almost like that bullshit is exactly the reason why so many Americans support stronger freedom of speech laws.

            • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              America doesn’t exist anymore, the remnamts of what used to be the USA is now part of the trump regime co-ruling with the junta of 6 formed from the remnants of the former institution known as the “supreme court”

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              America currently deports people for having come here from somewhere else. What the people have done between coming here and now is pretty much irrelevant to the process.