• yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I hate this argument. “You people can’t exist in public because I might have to talk to my stupid kids”.

    • richardwallass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      It’s not a question of being visible in public, it’s just a question of proportion. Hollywood seems to need gays and lesbians in every movie now. Is it marketing to attract “minorities” ?

      • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yeah, there’s nothing wrong with people being gay as long as they do it in secret and “normal” people don’t have to acknowledge it. /s

              • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                12 days ago

                Let me repeat myself: there is no such thing as “overrepresentation”. There isn’t, and shouldn’t be, a moral or legal law that states that TV and movie producers have to follow census data strictly in their casting. That would be stupid.

                  • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 days ago

                    You’re thinking about “documentaries”. There’s this whole other universe of films commonly referred to as “fiction”. Or are you upset that Hobbits are overrepresented in The Lord of the Rings, blue aliens in Avatar and people who can fly in Superman, too? Maybe there’s too many British people in Downton Abbey and too few Vietnamese in West Side Story?