GreenDust@lemmings.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-215 hours agoJesus nutlemmings.worldimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1315arrow-down19
arrow-up1306arrow-down1imageJesus nutlemmings.worldGreenDust@lemmings.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-215 hours agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squaregigastasio@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up82·13 hours agoAs someone who tests materials and parts like this for a living, I can look at that part and say with 100% certainty that it will last for a period of time.
minus-squarefunkajunk 🇨🇦@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·10 hours agoNanoseconds are technically a period of time, yes.
minus-squareNeondragon25@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·9 hours agoI think we can get a bigger number if we just measure in femtoseconds. And bigger number is better.
As someone who tests materials and parts like this for a living, I can look at that part and say with 100% certainty that it will last for a period of time.
Nanoseconds are technically a period of time, yes.
I think we can get a bigger number if we just measure in femtoseconds. And bigger number is better.