Charlie Kirk was too smart not to know that he was constantly lying.
His last words, “Counting or not counting gang violence?” were a red herring. Whether it’s gang violence is separate from whether it’s transgender people.
There is simply no way that he didn’t know he was being intentionally dishonest. And those were his last words.
Personally, I don’t believe in political violence for the most part, but I am not at all offended by the idea of violence against propagandists. People who spread lies and misinformation. That may be a distinction without a difference in modern America, but I still think it is important.
IMO he was an advocate for violence so doing violence to him is fair game. Live by the sword die by the sword. Doesn’t matter if you ever actually wield it yourself.
Saw someone earlier claiming he was killed while trying to have a good faith argument with people who’s opinions were different from his. Clowns.
Edit: the person saying he was having good faith arguments was Gavin Newsom.
Charlie Kirk was too smart not to know that he was constantly lying.
His last words, “Counting or not counting gang violence?” were a red herring. Whether it’s gang violence is separate from whether it’s transgender people.
There is simply no way that he didn’t know he was being intentionally dishonest. And those were his last words.
Personally, I don’t believe in political violence for the most part, but I am not at all offended by the idea of violence against propagandists. People who spread lies and misinformation. That may be a distinction without a difference in modern America, but I still think it is important.
IMO he was an advocate for violence so doing violence to him is fair game. Live by the sword die by the sword. Doesn’t matter if you ever actually wield it yourself.