• Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    In the Deceleration of Independence it states that “All men are created equal” and have certain rights like life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. In practice, sure, things are different.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      neat. propaganda written is still propaganda. heck it took literally more than a century for AMENDMENTS (ie: changes) to be written and agreed upon. Heck it took shutting down a terrorist organization in the process.

      stop pretending america was ever a good idea.

      • Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The belief in equality is what ultimately lead to slaves being free, right? The country was founded on the belief that all men are created equal as a goal to achieve, not a statement of how things were.

        But you are right, it was hypocrisy to say that and have it not apply to everyone.

          • vladmech@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 days ago

            You may want to go reread some of those declarations of secession by assorted states…. There’s a lot of “it’s our God given right to own humans as property” in them. But also you believe taxation equals theft so who even knows man.

              • vladmech@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                Oh the 13th Amendment does some shifty stuff with incarcerated people to this day, I get that. That being said, maybe read through the articles of secession from the various states, it’s enlightnening.
                https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states

                From Georgia “The prohibition of slavery in the Territories is the cardinal principle of this organization.”

                South Carolina “A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. He is to be entrusted with the administration of the common Government, because he has declared that that “Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free,” and that the public mind must rest in the belief that slavery is in the course of ultimate extinction. . . .”

                Mississippi "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin. "

                Taxes are a hassle and can frustrate me, especially when used for things I don’t agree with, but they also build roads and waterways and allow society to lift each other up. All that aside, the Civil War was fought because the Southern states wanted to continue owning people as property. They plainly stated it in their assorted articles of secession, I’m sorry you feel that knowing that somehow means I wasn’t taught US history I guess?

                • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.socialBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Why did the Union kept slaves, if they truly believed these declarations…

                  Though I find funny I’m reading taxation rhetorics when Fascists are running the greatest heist of the century. No wonder the Colonists spilled some tea in Boston, they knew the King of England wanted to

                  build roads and waterways and allow society to lift each other up

            • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.socialBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 days ago

              Was also crucified by merchants in the Church.

              Is this what libertarians propagandize now, that Abraham Lincoln freed his slaves because he utterly believed his slaves had rights?

              • PugJesus@piefed.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Was also crucified by merchants in the Church.

                Fucking what.

                Is this what libertarians propagandize now, that Abraham Lincoln freed his slaves because he utterly believed his slaves had rights?

        • flandish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          no. use of appropriate violence lead to the slaves being free*. you cannot vote away slavery, fascism, and other facets capitalists use to keep hold of their control and profits.

          • and they’re still not free. just locked up in for profit prisons. see a theme here?
          • PugJesus@piefed.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            no. use of appropriate violence lead to the slaves being free

            … by a massive state apparatus that was elected by people who believed in abolition.

            Jesus Christ. Dogmatic thinking that would make a religious fanatic blush.

            • flandish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              sure, elected. that’s a consistent facet - and elections happened on the confederate side too.

              the fix was, and has been shown throughout all history, not voting harder. it was violence.

              elected except for people like John Brown. but you go ahead and keep thinking voting harder is what “fixed” the confederacy.

    • Darnton@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Written while slavery existed, to just mention one example. What it teaches is that the US was build on lies and hypocrisy if nothing else.