• NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    As far as the American government is concerned, the 168 children are unpersons and therefore don’t matter.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Conflating Trump’s antics with typical American imperialist behavior is a dangerous game.

    I’m sure the strait would have been open, but there is no future where Kamala or Biden wouldn’t have greenlit Israel’s joint plan to degrade Iran’s nuclear program. People already forgot they were slinging missiles for the past 2+ years.

    Those 168 Iranians could have died just the same because it has already happened so many times before.

  • radiofreebc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I still blame Hillary and DWS for not running Bernie against Trump in 2016, for all this mess.

    Trump is not the disease, he is a symptom of the disease of corruption and greed that they exposed in 2016.

    Hillary and DWS couldn’t stand to have their corruption stopped by a decent human being, so they handed the country to the most vile human being to ever be President…to protect their own corruption. They would rather be ineffective opposition to a tyrant, than represent the People.

    Bernie would have wiped the floor with Trump, if he would have been given a chance. Instead, we’re here now…so that they can be there.

    Trump didn’t win in 2016, Hillary lost. Trump is just cashing in on the fact that America is corrupt to it’s core. They sold America out.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        One thing to keep in mind is that Hilary decided to not campaign in Michigan because it wasn’t a battle ground.

        IMO Bernie would have been the only one that could beat Trump. But we’ve no way of proving.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          her also being a woman doesnt help, her. mysogyny decides votes unfortunately. us isnt ready for a women president let alone a poc one.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The EC is part of the US problems, the main issue remains with the use of FPTP in the election.

          Get rid of both and institute proper elections, and not only will the GOP loose influence, you will actually have third parties with a chance of getting representation.

            • stoy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 hours ago

              As long as FPTP is still in place, the political landscape will keep moving to a duopoly, with a proper system, giving smaller parties a real chance you can get 6-7 different political parties in congress, that won’t really be possible with FPTP.

              • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 hours ago

                technically its a uniparty, since DNC and GOP vote or not vote on various things very similarly, and does backdoor deals.

        • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Since EC favors smaller state populations, which tend to vote Republican, is that ever likely to have popular vote go R but EC go D? I guess if there was higher than average turnout in Texas and Flordia who go R and less than average in California who go D it could work out, but seems unlikely.

          • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            That was an implied point to my statement. You’re exactly right. I guess I mean to say that if ever goes that direction, we’ll see them call it cheating.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If I was China, I would do it while Trump is president. The US is the only country that could realistically help Taiwan. So just make a deal and give Trump something he wants in exchange. That could be as simple as buying a ton of Nvidia cards or just giving the US exclusive market access in China, ensuring TSMC keeps producing chips and so on.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      china wont, they think long terms economically its just sabre rattling for internal consumption. they at least know trying to take taiwan would mean the chip factories get destroyed.