What I mean is like, what do you think is unironically awesome, even if people now think its cringe or stupid?

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    While there were some truly awful moments in the last season of game of thrones, danaerys’ arc was not one of them. Her going nuts was hinted at from the beginning and I wouldn’t have had it any other way.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        If she didn’t like a system that existed, she wanted to burn it to the ground, a person, burn them alive.

        Surely putting that person in charge couldn’t go wrong.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The problem isn’t the heel turn, the problem was that it happened on like 4 episodes. Rushed and lacked the time to show motive.

      Of course a Targaryen would go insane in their lust for power. The game of thrones consumes everyone.

      It just sucks that the show runners were like “and then she goes nuts and loses it all ok? The end. We’re gonna fuck off and make Stsr Wars now.” and it was so bad they even lost from Star Wars lol

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        But she didn’t suddenly lose it.

        She wiped out cities full of people before. But it took her doing it in Westeros for people to see that it was because she was insane.

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        See here’s the controversial take. I don’t agree with you at all. It was literally built up for the entire series and was the only natural conclusion. She was literally saying “I plan to break the wheel” from the start. That is not language a peaceful person uses. Her goals to begin with were those of a conqueror, and what we got was the natural end of that ambition when it crashes into reality.

        I think it was done beautifully, and the fact so many people bought into her side of things and felt betrayed is evidence of how well done it was.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nah, like they said… It’s not that it happened, it’s how it happened. She had never before turned on “her” people. She hadn’t even really ever turned on civillians so openly, either. It was definitely, unquestionably, rushed character development.

          It’s not that she went nuts, or even the specific, individual events. It’s how quickly she’s just suddenly cool with wasting people she wanted to rule. She was a relatively sane, motivated leader for years, maybe even decades, and suddenly, so close to victory, she drops any and all well established moral boundaries she’s clearly defined?

          That’s… not how crazy works. At all.

          • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I believe that her arc is a conqueror’s journey disguised as a hero’s journey, and it was done so well that everyone felt betrayed. This thread is for hot takes, so there’s mine. 😄

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yea, the events were a bit of a dick punch, but they were still so grossly rushed, though. I was so checked out of the story by then I just laughed. GoT had become a weird parody of itself. Interesting, subtle character developments with interplay and dynamics? NOPE!! Cliche, sudden twists to shock the brainless TV audience in to clapping like seals? CHECK