• taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Bizarrely it’s probably more eco friendly than not having the tradition since those tree farms probably wouldn’t exist otherwise. It’s not like the meat industry, it’s probably net positive on emissions.

    Though, it would be better if we just reduced urban sprawl and deforestation of natural forests, etc., but that’s how it goes I guess.

    • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      My sister in law’s family owns a christmas tree farm in Maine. They do replant what they cut and more, and its just like 3 people running it since it’s all in the family on owned family land, so not bad for over 80 acres of evergreens

    • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Its definitely more eco friendly, the alternative is plastic trees which are worse for the environment.

      Christmas trees capture CO2 while they mature and are biodegradable/renewable

      • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        We have compost programs in my area, and they usually offer free christmas tree disposal. Some programs mulch them, and I think the Parks&Rec department uses the mulch to maintain parks.

        I don’t really see a big downside.

        • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Absolutely no downside, we should be advocating for natural trees vs the fake ones.

          Though, i must admit I’m guilty of temptation – the thought of not having to wrangle lights with a prelit tree does entice me (i haven’t given in though ✊)