• LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I mean technically so are repos to some extent. Many of them have very few maintainers and you are basically just blindly trusting that they won’t both miss anything malicious nor be the cause of it.

        A little safer but not some ultimate Bastion of safety

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Not really as repos go thought testing and most distros have reproducible builds.

          AUR packages can be submitted by anyone with no testing or validation for the most part.

  • nroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    No, then you fix the code to work with your current system libraries and upstream the patch and version bump. This happens less on Arch, BTW ;-)

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    The last picture in the meme always bothered me, because the sequence doesn’t make any sense physically. (Popping the rake from mid air and doing the wrong flip and such)

    So, I went on to find the sequence that I believe it was drawn from.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 days ago

      you think the sequence doesn’t make physical sense, but skateboarding on a rake is fine?

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I know it’s completely off-topic, but anyway. No, I’m fine with the rake. That’s what’s makes it funny.

        It’s the drawing of the skater that is too good, and that doesn’t add up with the other details being wrong. Someone who can draw a skater that good wouldn’t make the other things that wrong or even random.

        The rake is drawn as doing a frontside shove-it, popped from mid-air and failing because of gravity suddenly changing in the middle of the sequence. The skater is “obviously” doing a varial heelflip instead of a frontside shove-it.

        So that’s the clue to why I thought it was drawn off an actual picture. That the background is also a copy of the original only reaffirms my theory.

        In hindsight I can also see that the skater is obviously Andrew Reynolds. The tuck and landing is his signature style.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 days ago

    Last week was the first time I think I’ve ever got a random Internet tarball to configure, make and make install. Program even did what it was supposed to too. I was amazed.

    • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It means that I did not installed a certain software due to the dev not providing any binaries or at least making it a little bit easier to compile it myself.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Fyi, it wouldn’t necessarily be better with a binary if you are missing dependencies, since it might have dynamically linked libraries (I’d say it probably does but tbh I’m not sure whether dynamic or static linked libraries are more common with Linux programs shared on the internet as my experience there is more with building them for work stuff rather than downloading and installing).

      • somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        As a former Fedora user; if you know/want to know/learning how linux works, or if you are encountering this far too often, switch to EndeavourOS or Arch Linux if you’re sure. Don’t worry, 99% of things you care will work via Distrobox if you can’t find it neither on the official repos nor the AUR (impossible.).

        Edit: was

        • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          The only reason I am using fedora is because I wanted to try it out. I did use Arch (and also Endeavour) before but wanted to try out fedora.

  • foodandart@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Oh sweet Jesus! LOL! This is me, though not with Linux, but trying to use Macports to get some damn program running and failing miserably because I couldn’t get the permissions set on the dependencies correctly.

    Rake right to the face. FML.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    There should be some kind of automated certification for git repos, where if the described install process does not complete on a default install of the most popular OS, the software gets a big red “does not work” label.

  • ian@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    As a non IT person I find Linux way better for installing software. The sort of apps non IT people use. The Software store has most of what I need. There rest I install the Windows way. From a website. Apps with a Linux version almost always detect and offer a Linux button to click to install. I wouldn’t know what to do if that didn’t work. Ditch that application I guess. My distros are pretty standard. Not hacked about. My apps are not too weird. I’ve been doing it this way for 14+ years. Never needed the CLI either.