• Pika@rekabu.ru
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Interestingly, it’s not about the look of genitalia specifically.

    For example, I happen to be a hetero person, yet I appreciate both genitals equally. What matters is how feminine the carrier is. I’ll appreciate a nice dick on a beautiful woman, but on a man…ew. Same with vaginas - if it belongs to a woman, it can be very arousing, but you won’t find trans men in my bedroom.

    It’s the same genitals, but their perception is wildly different.

          • fracture@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            the craziest part to me is the implication that a guy who’s into women or trans men is perfectly straight, as long as those trans men didn’t have bottom surgery, because pussy is pussy (?)

          • Pika@rekabu.ru
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            I like women, hence, I’m hetero. Shouldn’t be too hard.

            Now, you can make categories of dick lovers and vagina appreciators, but “hetero”, just as “homo” and the rest, refers to gender attraction, not genitals. No need to gatekeep that.

            I have no objection being called queer, but definitionally I’m just not.

            • undefinedValue@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              No it actually refers to sex, not gender. Gay for a man is loving dick, not loving males.

              Definitionally you aren’t hetero if you enjoy both sexual organs.