• Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I mean, of all the things to cut off of them, Chrome made the least sense to me. It’s not a profitable part of the business, it would just die if spun off. The only reason Firefox is alive is because Google is funding them. Plus changing what browser you use is much easier than some of the other monopolies they have (Android, ads, YouTube).

  • Squiddork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    8 days ago

    So they found Google guilty of monopolistic practices then agreed to do nothing about it.

    Sounds about right.

  • Auth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    How disappointing but expected. I’m not even sure what would break googles search engine dominance outside of search engines becoming obsolete. I use DDG and I find it to be better than google but still so many people stand by google search with strong loyalty.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Oh come on now. All of the strong options would have worked. Don’t let Google buy its competition off. Don’t let Google buy it’s default position. Don’t let Google control the browser. That’s it, problem solved.

      You claim people are loyal, but if that were true, the aforementioned payoffs would not exist.

  • DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    With reports of Elon Musk eying to buy Chrome or OpenAI… sorry but I believe this was the best outcome, what we need is people using more Firefox that is one of the few non-Chromium browser out there.

    • chaospatterns@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Was that anything more than just rumors? Letting a currently monopolistic company keep the browser because another bad billionaire might buy it and do something bad with it just prevents anything from changing.

      • DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Who would buy a browser for billions and billions of dollars? Just see who has this amount of money and how aggressive they would need to be to get return of investment.

  • black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    But he did…bar the search giant from making exclusive deals to distribute its search or AI assistant products in ways that might cut off distribution for rivals.

    Oh boy there goes Firefox

  • Korkki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    So they have to give away search data?

    Is there an antitrust on android or appstore ongoing?