• snoons@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 days ago

      Now they just have to understand what sustainable means beyond it being a buzzword.

  • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    13 days ago

    Looking forward the 2026 ESG reports of large companies that are so happy to embrace AI :)

      • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’m not into gold panning… though it’s not like all companies are using AI so much that it will transpire in their ESG. Now I now a couple that were so far very happily ignoring this source of carbon and, as far as I remember, it was not reported by the cloud providers either.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    13 days ago

    Fuck AI and these energy guzzling data centers. For decades we were told to conserve power and such and now all of those savings are being sucked up, and more, by these centers.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    14 days ago

    Hooray for cancer, asthma and bronchitis! Make America Healthy Again. Lung health is like Karate – black is the best!

  • madsen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    13 days ago

    It’s fucking insane how much is invested (both money and natural resources) in the emperor’s new clothes. Let’s scorch the planet because every idiot out there buys into the marketing and hype. We are utterly and truly doomed because of ourselves.

    • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      13 days ago

      AI and the investment around it are literally the only thing holding up America’s economy right now. If you take the artificial growth and the vast amounts of investment that are being pumped in AI development data centers, the US economy has barely grown half percentage point.

      No surprise that they are going to power this beast at all costs until it falls apart along with the US economy.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        No surprise that they are going to power this beast at all costs

        I mean, they could use their fascist power grab to drive through the infrastructure work to expand power transmission lines needed to support a modern economy, renewables, and yes more datacenters

        Additional coal is just the easiest way since we already have century old power lines bringing that power where it’s needed

        Yes, in this case, coal might be easiest, cheapest, fastest because we can continue to neglect infrastructure. It’ll fall apart on someone else’s administration

        • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          Typical. So basically, they’re gonna turn America into Texas. Their power grid is famously shitty and has been neglected for decades due to Republican control of the government. They are constantly kicking the can down the road for some other administration to deal with it.

          Everyone time there’s even a slight dusting of snow anywhere in Texas the power grid shuts off and people freeze to death. But Texas refuses to fix the power grid and nationalize because it would mean investing and bringing their shitty substandard power grid up to modern standards.

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      13 days ago

      Future generations will look back on the pre apocalypse population and call us sleep walkers. I know, as I’m one of them. Life is difficult enough already without jeopardising my freedom as the only way to change our course is violence at this point.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 days ago

        Future generations will look back on the pre apocalypse population

        If it makes you feel any better, our '01, '08, '14, and '20 recessions all put hard downward pressure on carbon emissions.

        If Trump manages to throw us into the first full blown Depression in a century, he may do more to curb US emissions than any president in history.

      • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        All of these problems are caused by a remarkably small network of people. I’m not even necessarily talking about the CEOs. It’s the boards of directors. This is also the pool from which CEOs are drawn one and the pool to which CEOs return after their golden parachute. They function as a living repository of evil. A warehouse of criminals and nepo-babies. (Ex: Airbnb guy joined DOGE and is on teslas board. So first he destroys the housing market for a generation, and then destroys the government, and he is the person who directs Tesla.)

        Like, the network is so small it could fit in one big room.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        There’s still time for a general strike. The country would be brought to its knees if suddenly deprived of profit and labor. That tactic was extremely effective in Chile in 2019, and had they not fallen for the trick of liberal reform, they would’ve had a successful revolution on their hands with virtually no bloodshed.

        If you aren’t in a union (or even if you are, it’s worth dual-carding), please consider joining the IWW to unionize your workplace (bonus: you’ll get higher wages, better benefits, and more time off if you succeed!) to strengthen a general strike if we manage to enact one.

        And for our international friends, you should join one as well, as fascism is gaining momentum globally. If your country isn’t listed below, just contact the IWW directly in the link above.

        • 🇦🇷 Argentina: FORA
        • 🇦🇺 Australia: ASF-IWA
        • 🇧🇷 Brazil: FOB
        • 🇧🇬 Bulgaria: ARS, CITUB
        • 🇩🇪 Germany: FAU
        • 🇬🇷 Greece: ESE
        • 🇮🇹 Italy: USI
        • 🇳🇱 🇧🇪 Netherlands & Belgium: Vriji Bond
        • 🇪🇸 Spain: CNT
        • 🇸🇪 Sweden: SAC
        • 🇬🇧 United Kingdom: UVW

        Also @FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world

    • YeahToast@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      13 days ago

      Well, I mean it’s not all marketing and hype. I was able to get it to write a piece of code to scrape a RSS feed and email me if it met certain perameters. I couldn’t have done that without a real grind / if at all. This is effectively the only time I’ve used it, and I think it’s atrocious the amount of petty shit people use it for… but there can be a functional benefit to generative AI. Makes me shed a tear thinking of the energy demand though.

      • lightsblinken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 days ago

        i have been using “rss2email” for years. extremely simple, works great, deterministic. no need to reinvent the wheel for a simple use case, and thats half the point here - a lot of “solutions” being found were already solved.

        • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Isnt this essentially the case by definition? If LLMs can solve a problem it’s only because a human already solved that problem (not that this is any different from what humans do)

        • YeahToast@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          In this scenario it needs to read a 5 day forecast capture key elements and only send the email/ alert the first time and not the following 4 days(if the alert remains the same) so in my previous attempts at RSS reader apps already in existence, they didn’t meet the need.

      • madsen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Jesus fucking Christ, man. RSS parsers and emailing are literally next up after “Hello, World” in programming. If that would have required “months and months of learning” as you stated elsewhere, then maybe programming just isn’t for you — AI or no AI. It’s OK not being able to do something! However, it’s some next level 1st world entitlement shit to think that you’re somehow entitled to be able to create programs without any effort on your part and with a complete disregard for the cost to the environment and the planet.

        • YeahToast@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          I have a low carbon footprint and my solar has exported 17,000 kWh more than my usage. Please tell me again how a 0.3 watt hour query is me completely disregarding the environment

          Edit: I have ai generated search engine summaries turned off… I hope you do too

        • YeahToast@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          I might not have been clear, no I don’t think I could have done it. Or if I could it would have taken months and months of learning . This was generated in about 5 queries and a total of 25 minutes testing.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        People have been making web crawlers for the past 30 years. Why do you need to torch an acre of forest to do the same?

        • YeahToast@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          I’m sure people have been making crawlers for 30 years… But I haven’t been, so I’ve been able to access “knowledge” and shape it for my use case. I think equating ~5 queries to torching an acre of forest is a bit hyperbolic which doesn’t help anyone.

  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    13 days ago

    Datacenter != AI

    If you are using the internet for anything with cloud storage, you are contributing to datacenter growth. And that includes nearly everyone using social media.

    • kcuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      13 days ago

      Sure but energy use per datacenters was on a downward trend before ai, then it went the other way hard

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Datacenter != AI

      Except the demand for new data centers is driven entirely by the capacity constraints of the current AI models.

      If you are using the internet for anything with cloud storage, you are contributing to datacenter growth.

      “Why are you mad at my five ton diseal SUV when you just adopted a pet chihuahua? They both emit carbon!”

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’m not sure that’s true. Every company uses storage, and every growing company needs more. But very few companies are training generative AIs.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 days ago

          Every company uses storage, and every growing company needs more.

          You’re comparing mountains to molehills. That’s before you consider improvements in storage and compression relative to demands for space, or the degree to which our storage capacity “needs” are predicated on the voracious appetite of AI models and their unwanted output. Or, for that matter, the inefficient distribution of data and proliferation of spam data that predates it.

          very few companies are training generative AIs

          Most US Growth Now Rides on AI—And Economists Suspect a Bubble

          The expansion in demand is entirely being driven by the expansion in AI capacity.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            That article doesn’t say what you imply it does. Companies may be using ChatGPT to grow, but that doesn’t mean they are training AIs.

            And the distinction is critical to energy usage. Training a new AI uses a lot of energy. Querying an existing AI uses far less.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Companies may be using ChatGPT to grow, but that doesn’t mean they are training AIs.

              It’s the MAG7 that’s driving growth. And they’re all fixated on training AI in some capacity

              Training a new AI uses a lot of energy. Querying an existing AI uses far less.

              It costs $5 for each 10s video generation, based on Azure’s published rates for the first Sora model.

              That’s presumably a lot of energy.

              • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                13 days ago

                The MAG7 operate large and growing cloud services, so their datacenter costs would grow even without any AI training.

                And charging $5 for a video query does not mean the query uses $5 of energy. The query is priced to recoup training costs that were already incurred.

    • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Yes but data center growth prior to AI was manageable. There isn’t a grid on the planet (except maybe china?) which can support the growth of AI data centers.

      These people have to plan energy needs on a 10-20 year life cycle, not 2. It’s the 2 that’s the problem.

        • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          I thought they were totally just using flare gas and renewables ;) 🙄

          But my understanding for real is that ai data centers are just the same hardware as buttcoin but more of it and organized. The venture capitalists finally got what they wanted, blowing their wad on Nvidia.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          China already has 200% the capacity relative to their demand. They’ve been growing solar fast enough to beat very high 8%+ electricity consumption growth last year, and can probably keep the pace.

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      I’m perfectly fine with Lemmy being limited to 100% renewable power. Don’t burn coal or LNG for me.

  • sgtgig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    13 days ago

    We were too addicted to AI slop to save ourselves.

    Actually no, no one was addicted to AI slop, it was just shoved into every product so that huge companies could make a profit and everyone hates it.

    But wait! The huge companies are losing tons money on this.

    Why did we destroy the planet again???

    • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 days ago

      Wish my coworkers would get the memo. Constantly trying to shove AI videos in my face like “haha look at MLK Jr and Tupac as pro wrestling announcers haha”

      As an artist I am deeply repulsed by AI. But other people around me? They love it for some reason.

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      12 days ago

      The capitalist class loves the idea and rewards companies with investment money. They think it could be the ultimate tool to snuff out any power the working class still has; making many employees optional, total surveillance of the population, etc. I think it will be a long time until it can do many jobs, but the surveillance tech seems to be coming along pretty well (with “AI” cameras recording license plates and biometric identifiers being put up everywhere).

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Meanwhile China is going all in on renewables.

    Here is a fact: an authoritarian non-democracy is doing a lot for securing the future of humanity, while the “leader of the free world” are vandalizing the climate and accelerating apocalyptic climate catastrophe.

    In 2025, China is a net positive for the future of humanity, while the USA is a net negative.

    If that makes you uncomfortable about what our political and economic systems in the West that brought us here, well, you know the meme: “facts don’t care about your feelings”.

    If you, like me, care about the future of democracy, we have to do a LOT of digging.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      We are a nation of man/woman children. Petulant little kids who don’t want to grow up and be responsible for anything.

    • neighbourbehaviour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Our current system is going about how Marx predicted it would. The course correction that occurred after the Great Depression has been now completely reversed and we’re back staring at its approaching collapse. I don’t think we can escape that long term, and we’ll lose democracy in the process, unless we start moving away from capitalism. We gotta attack private firm ownership. Otherwise we’ll keep getting people accumulate enough capital to buy the rest of the system and steamroll the rest of us for profit.

      • Corridor8031@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        capitalism was kind of never democratic i think, considering so much is basically dictated by the people who “own” it, which feels more like a dictatorship/ feudalism

        • neighbourbehaviour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Oh for sure. There’s however a higher degree of democracy than feudalism, mostly stemming one way or another from the newly developed labour power under capitalism. Power that labour has slowly ceded over the last 50-70 years or so, but it can still regain when pressed. The system still contains this vulnerability (from the point of view of the capitalist) and it seems impossible to eradicate.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Meanwhile China is going all in on renewables.

      BUT

      AT

      WHAT

      COST

      If that makes you uncomfortable about what our political and economic systems in the West that brought us here, well, you know the meme: “facts don’t care about your feelings”.

      It might be cold comfort, but none of these business models have the liquidity behind them to build out coal power at the levels they claim they’ll need.

      Nevermind that solar/wind would be cheaper. Or that the raw manpower to yield coal in quantity no longer exists. So much of these proposals are - at their heart - the same vaporware that promised waves of new nuclear construction and hydro-power and geothermal.

      Bottom line is that GenAI’s primary revenue comes from dumb VC and bad debt. They can’t build, much less operate, any of this shit.