• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    2 months ago

    I’d say 3, except that the 3 on the line above has a flat bottom line.

    If it’s also missing some dots from the middle, it could be part of the second and third columns of a 2.

    • radix@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      I still vote for 3.

      The 7 above is also missing some dots on the right, so there’s an entire vertical strip of erased ink. The numbers are up to 5 dots wide, but the existing 3 only has 4 dots on the bottom. It’s possible that a fifth is supposed to be there one spot higher, matching the missing number, but it just got clipped by the erased part.