• nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Switching to LiFePo and making the batteries easy to swap along a trip, is a better way to reduce fires.

    Or solid state maybe? Not sure how flammable they are, but I know LiFePo are much lower risk than standard lithium ion (Nickle cobalt or whatever Tesla and the big Chevy trucks use )

    Edited for spelling

    • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      I started exploring more LiFePo4s, NiMH are sometimes a safer bet. We don’t have many options out there unfortunately.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I know NiMH are way easier to charge, but lifepo4 has better capacity and way more charging cycles I believe.

        The tricky thing with iron phosphate is that the voltage level between 75-80 and fully charged is very flat, so it’s difficult to reliably know the state of charge.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Solid state batteries are much safer, but much more expensive to make in facilities resembling chip fab clean rooms.