• Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 days ago

    Lions are pretty strong, right? While the armor could protect from being mauled or clawed, the impact of those hits would add up. That’s why things like the mace and other blunt instruments came to be.

    And given the title and lack of comma, the lion in full armor is a given, easily.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    By necessity the hands and feet of plate armor are thinner and more flexible. If a lion was able to get a hand or a foot in its mouth, it’s game over for the knight. They have more than enough bite force to crush the armor and the body part inside.

    One big benefit of the plate armor when facing a lion is that the armor was usually shaped to deflect and defend against strikes to the head and neck. Lions usually dispatch their prey by crushing the throat and asphyxiating them. The armor should be a good defense against such attacks.

    What I think it comes down to is terrain. If the lion can ambush the knight, the knight will be knocked down before they can bring any weapons to bear effectively. From there, their armor will only make their demise slower and more agonizing. If there is no cover and the knight sees the lion coming, they may be able to keep the lion at bay with weapon swipes. This gives the knight the opportunity for a killing blow or for multiple strikes to make the lion retreat. The knight just has to hope the lion doesn’t charge regardless of potential harm because then it’s just the first scenario again.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      If, however you shove your arm down it’s throat to the shoulder, your pauldrons might give you some protection, and the arm and hand can now choke the lion from the inside. It’s gonna try to claw you back out, but hopefully it doesn’t gain a purchase, and then the fight is over in less than 5 minutes.

      This is actually what I’ve heard suggested, without the armor, to survive a Jaguar attack in South America

      • Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Your arm would be destroyed from the bites, armored or not.

        You might survive, but your arm wouldn’t and you’d need medical attention to prevent death from blood loss or crush syndrome.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        A lion is 2-3 times as large as a Jaguar though. There is a good chance they just tear your arm off at the shoulder and run off with it.

  • Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    If the knight was equipped with a shield and sword - Knight.

    If the knight had neither - Knight.

    Even if the knight had no shield or weapons, it would fare better because his limbs become the next weapon being covered in armor a lion cannot penetrate. At least immediately. The only chance a lion remotely has is if it manages to knock the knight’s helmet off and go for the face and head following a takedown.

    But I also wouldn’t say it’d be easy for the knight either because, all of that weight will just fall onto him should he be tackled. A full suit of armor typically weighs 50 pounds all over combined. So if a lion tackles the knight and manages to have enough intelligence to try and use suffocation as a means, that’s 50 pounds + the weight of the lion of 420, that knight is not getting up anytime soon.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    100% the knight.

    Steel armor is quite resistant, and the lion doesn’t have anything that could realistically penetrate it or blunt it.

    Even without weapon once they are entangled into a fight there’s two outcomes, the lion runs away once it notices it’s fighting a moving rock. Or the lion gets tired, once tired the human can beat it to death even without a weapon. Humans are famous for their resistance, we have more stamina for long fights and the presence of an armor will make the fight long.

    If the human have a weapon there isn’t even a contest.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    The lion lacks a can opener.

    But the setting was a fight to death, therefore we have to assume that the lion actually wants to kill, not just eat.

    So the lion strikes once, and the knight goes down immediately from the blow. Then it’s over because of the immobility caused by the full armor.

    • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Contrary to popular belief, a set of full plate does not slow you down or limit your mobility at all. If it did it would not have been so widely adopted.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            It’s a reasonable assumption but there was a… French? king who survived a battlefield gut wound because the knife stuck in his stomach to the hilt didn’t make it through the fat.

            Knights were nobility by definition, and it was precisely as plate became a reality that conditioning standards were dropping.

            Of course they also brings up that what a “knights full armor” is varies widely by time and place

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            It’s worth mentioning there’s different kinds of full plate armour, too. It’s going to be harder to move around in something designed for mounted jousting, with hard impacts and strict rules, than something made for actual infantry use. That being said, you can obviously jump up on a horse even in jousting armour, and this is an actual knight who we can assume is in excellent physical condition and has a lifetime of practice.

  • RagnarokOnline@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Winner: Lion (in round 1)

    I think you gotta consider that a knight has likely never seen a lion or a beast of such proportions before. If you put the knight into a moderate-sized arena with a large cat, I’m willing to bet the bravery of the knight fails him and he is mauled to death by the lion.

    It all comes down to the mental game.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      IDK man. Knights know what a bear is, lions aren’t that much scarier than bears and bears are larger. And AFAIK, knights should be trained to stand their ground if fleeing is not an option, which it clearly isn’t, because large animals are always faster than humans on foot and anyone who ever hunted from horseback (which was very common for knights) would know that.

      In contrast, has the lion ever had experience with being hit by a sword, spear etc.? I know boars will often just keep attacking, but is that true for big cats, too, or will they decide that the fight isn’t worth it and try to fuck off?

      • RagnarokOnline@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        If the arena is a forest, I think you’re right that there’s a chance the knight plucks up the courage to fight and the lion runs away. In that case, the knight would be called the victor.

        But if it’s a smaller arena… and the lion can’t flee… well then you’ve got a big cat cornered with a decision to fight for its life. I’ve seen an 8lb house cat cornered in real life by a human before and it was terrifying.

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I think you gotta consider that a knight has likely never seen a lion or a beast of such proportions before.

      You do realize that like 90% of knights had a lion on their crests and coat of arms?

      • RagnarokOnline@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, but like, seeing a 2-inch by 2-inch medieval depiction of what a lion is and actually seeing a 420lb roaring beast are two different things. They didn’t have TV or Internet, so like, most people on the planet would never be within 100 miles of a lion in their whole lives.

        Nam sayin’?

        • remon@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          But they know they exist and they are probably familiar with wolfs and bears, so it’s not like they would be totally awestruck and not know what to do or expect.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Kinda hard to see how a lion would win this. Lion probably dies immediately to a sword stroke. If it gets past the sword and tries to bite or swipe at the knight, it might have a chance, but even then the knight still has a chance to draw their dagger. If the dagger doesn’t work (bit hard to stab a lion with a dagger), I can’t imagine that the lion would actually stick around to gnaw the tin can to death.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Doesn’t say “armed knight”. 😉

      So assuming a lion vs. a knight who can just turtle and hope for the best? I give the edge to the lion.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        If the knight isn’t armed, I’ll assume the lion is declawed and too old to still have teeth.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Armed or unarmed? Armor might help you not die for a while…but without weapons, there isn’t much a person could do to kill a lion.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Shove an armored arm down it’s throat to the shoulder. It will possibly suffocate and die. This is the advice I have emheard for unarmed and unarmored humans to survive a Jaguar attack in South America. I would wager that chain and plate mail would level the playing field against a lion.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        That sounds like someone was pulling your leg. How do you get an arm down a moving animal’s throat, and past it’s limb-severing jaws?

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Depends on the “full armor”. Full plate? The knight can probably win even without a weapon, as the gauntlets will make his punches more dangerous. Chainmail + gambeson would probably protect the knight enough, but any exposed parts, especially the neck, would make the fight super dangerous for the human.

    Keep in mind that certain blunt strikes, or even the strength of the lion’s bite, can hurt or even disable a limb, even if it’s protected with armor, be it plate or chainmail (the gambeson helps protect against these strikes). Ever seen how dogs can grab a person’s arm and twist it hard? Now imagine that dog weighs 150kg and it should be pretty clear how you can still get fucked. Also, the lion will likely run and pounce, taking down the knight who will be at a disadvantage. Humans are strong, but lions are waaaaaay stronger.