• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 minutes ago

    Movie mash-ups.

    Back to the Future and Tron.

    Blade Runner and Hawaii 5-0

    Truman and Silo.

    Mrs. Doubtfire and John Wick.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      WALL-E and alien.

      What I wouldn’t give to see a seam of Xenomorphs tear ass through that ship full of obese humans

  • Kennystillalive@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Or maybe, just maybe do a new franchise or movie. I’m so tired of going to the cinema and watching the trailers for 9 ouf of the 10 comming up movies being sequals or reboots of old franchises.

    • daddycool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      If they can’t even make a good sequal or reboot of an old successful franchise, how do you expect them to make a good movie/franchise from scratch?

  • Folstar@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Nice idea, but you’d never get funding. So lean into it. Instead of remaking flops, demake them. Redo Battlefield Earth or Waterworld on a half million dollar budget. As the world watches your film with effects that would make Sharknado blush they will finally ask “what is art?”

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The best example is The Thing. The original film in the 1950s was awkward af. But the 1980s remake by John Carpenter was chef’s kiss. Then they made a remake of a remake and it was meh.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The 2011 The Thing wasn’t so much a remake as it was a prequel to the remake, telling the story from the Norwegian scientists’ camp.

      The 1982 John Carpenter remake opened with the last two remaining Norwegian scientists chasing “The Thing” until it reaches the Americans’ camp. But they’re misunderstood by the Americans. When trying to shoot at The Thing, which has taken the shape of a sled dog, the Americans instead return fire and kill them. Then the Americans explore the Norwegian camp and try to figure out what horrors killed everyone there, while slowly discovering why they were shooting at a dog in the first place.

      The 2011 film shows what happened to the Norwegians before the 1982 remake. You’re correct, it wasn’t as great of a film (hard to compete with John Carpenter), but it wasn’t exactly a remake.

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        It was a weird combination of remake and prequel. It hit all the same story points and barely added anything new apart from Tetris aliens.

    • tahoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You scared me for a second, being only aware of the 80s one I thought you wanted a remake of that lol

  • JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Instead of the corporatization of storytelling, we should be letting artists tell the stories they want to tell. We should engage with our media more critically and stop chasing nostalgia.

  • gdog05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I think I’ve made this comment elsewhere but Krull, Enemy Mine, and Last Starfighter are the top of my list for an effects refresh.

    There’s also no reason why a decent Eragon movie couldn’t be made.