I’m sure you wouldn’t want someone to completely disregard your experiences out of hand, correct? Like how you just did to u/BlackLazor.
Just like they did to me, when they said the only thing that drew me to communism was “propaganda” as opposed to my time working under capitalism. The difference is that I discounted their unsubstantiated claims about statistical facts while they discounted my own journey.
According to Quora
According to Quora? Great, so now we have two internet randos saying something.
the wait time was around 10 years
Which is significantly less than what they claimed. So the two internet randos can’t even agree. In that case, which of them should I treat as an absolute authority and which one should I “completely disregard the experiences of out of hand” to use your pretentious language?
Russia Beyond
Finally. Say what you will about Russian state media, but at least it’s more of a source than random people on the internet, which you seem to primarily rely on.
says the wait time was 6-7 years. . . This source also says that Public sector employees (doctors, teachers, etc) had a wait time of 10 or more years.
Which completely contradicts the other user.
Looking at all this, it seems to me what u/Blacklazor said was not incorrect. It may be exaggerated, but the sources say most people lived in cramped apartments with too many people per sqm, were waiting “More than 10 years” to upgrade, and didnt’ get to specify which apartment one was given, or where it was located. So far the account checks out.
What on earth?? “The account checks out” when they were exaggerating somewhere between 2-5 times the actual numbers?
The claim was not, “you had to wait 20-30 years for an upgrade” it was specifically "You weren’t getting any housing in that system. You could enlist in a queue and wait for 20-30 years to get piss poor commie block apartment." That’s completely unsupported by your sources.
What I did say is that you had the same kind of reaction against u/Blacklazor that a religious person does when confronted with questions of faith, because you did. You completely disregarded the account and made zero effort to assess or examine your own position.
It’s also the same reaction a scientist tends to have towards a flat-earther. I don’t know why you think a random internet person saying things is something that should be treated as a reliable source. If someone says, “I walked and walked for miles and the earth seemed really flat the whole way,” am I allowed to “discount their entire experience” or am I supposed to “put effort into reassessing my position” regarding the shape of the earth?
As it turns out, I was 100% right to be skeptical, because your own sources back me up and show that the other person was completely wrong.
Just like they did to me, when they said the only thing that drew me to communism was “propaganda” as opposed to my time working under capitalism. The difference is that I discounted their unsubstantiated claims about statistical facts while they discounted my own journey.
According to Quora? Great, so now we have two internet randos saying something.
Which is significantly less than what they claimed. So the two internet randos can’t even agree. In that case, which of them should I treat as an absolute authority and which one should I “completely disregard the experiences of out of hand” to use your pretentious language?
Finally. Say what you will about Russian state media, but at least it’s more of a source than random people on the internet, which you seem to primarily rely on.
Which completely contradicts the other user.
What on earth?? “The account checks out” when they were exaggerating somewhere between 2-5 times the actual numbers?
The claim was not, “you had to wait 20-30 years for an upgrade” it was specifically "You weren’t getting any housing in that system. You could enlist in a queue and wait for 20-30 years to get piss poor commie block apartment." That’s completely unsupported by your sources.
It’s also the same reaction a scientist tends to have towards a flat-earther. I don’t know why you think a random internet person saying things is something that should be treated as a reliable source. If someone says, “I walked and walked for miles and the earth seemed really flat the whole way,” am I allowed to “discount their entire experience” or am I supposed to “put effort into reassessing my position” regarding the shape of the earth?
As it turns out, I was 100% right to be skeptical, because your own sources back me up and show that the other person was completely wrong.