Frankly, I very much believe this is a reading issue more than a writing issue, but I do agree the solution is “give it another pass.”
Right now we have a data set of 1/1 that had issues comprehending what I meant. When both sides of that number tick up, we can talk about the data tending towards that it was poorly written.
Wait, being directly cited as not being akin to the three states I listed is a bad thing?
I couldn’t disagree more.
That’s not what you did. If that’s what you were trying you may want to give it another pass.
If santa, the tooth fairy, and khan can all live on in the minds of dreamers, so too can chicken/bell/hut live in our hearts.
What they have written is confident and not comparing the food to the fasciats.
Frankly, I very much believe this is a reading issue more than a writing issue, but I do agree the solution is “give it another pass.”
Right now we have a data set of 1/1 that had issues comprehending what I meant. When both sides of that number tick up, we can talk about the data tending towards that it was poorly written.