• A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    ·
    7 days ago

    Just to spell out what many comments already hint at:

    There are no US-made routers. “Made” here refers to companies, not where the stuff is actually made. Even if the plastic housing happened to be made in the US for one or two products, the components are still from far away.

    Those few US companies paid MAGA for this.

    This is corruption pure and simple.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      7 days ago

      And also I’m SURE there will be no backdoors installed in these routers. This was a mutual deal to control information, not just a financial one

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s okay when it’s OUR backdoor, it’s not okay when it’s their speculative backdoor.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Those few US companies paid MAGA for this.

      Almost certainly not just a money thing. They very likely also made deals for government access to and control of their devices. This isn’t just corruption. It is fascism.

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well, you can run your own router on your own hardware but other than that, agreed.

        • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          My point was mostly that the concept of a router can be executed by any computer with more than one NIC.

          Trump isn’t disallowing computers from outside the US, surely, only stuff that looks like routers. They’ll have a hard time defining what a router is.

          • Reygle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yeah, I wonder how the dumbasses licking his boots will feel about brands like Qotom/etc making high interface mini pcs- whether they consider them “routers” under this. I hope we don’t have to go back to what I did 10 years ago- cheap intel desktops with 3-4 nics.

      • andallthat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        well, Trump has a worryingly faint and ever-changing idea of where the USA borders end…

    • excral@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      New business venture: sell computers that totally aren’t routers, pinky promise, but just randomly happen to run OpenWrt perfectly and have all the needed hardware.

  • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    7 days ago

    The rent for your ISP provided hardware is about to go up by x10. Also you will get a letter saying you don’t have an approved router installed.

  • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    7 days ago

    So consumer grade routers are a security risk, but not ISP switches or server routers? That’s the opposite of what a state level actor would look for.

    • ferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      I mean, it’s kind of old news that these consumer routers make up the majority of bot nets, although I doubt requiring them to be US-made will change much.

      • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        As I read it, they are scared of the Chinese Communist Party having an “official” back door built in. Not run-of-the-mill criminal bot-nets.

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    6 days ago

    What’s the play here? Something isn’t making sense.

    With the Trump administration, the only thing you can be sure of is that the stated reason isn’t the real reason. Somebody’s got to be getting a payday from this.

    • Bieren@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s a money grab. About the only networking companies that build in the us are like Cisco and juniper. Which odds are, you aren’t running at home. This is without a doubt a money grab. Google and Amazon will gladly pay the exemption fee. Some others will as well. This isn’t about security or “pay American”. It’s a money grab.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      Same play as always. Bullies countries and corps to get what he wants. As long as it serves him that’s all he cares about.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      There will be some meetings with oems, and gold things dropped on his desk, and the exceptions will start being handed out. Same as always.

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    7 days ago

    Be ready to get shut out of the global internet and only use Trumpernet.

    Seriously though, they’ll block yalls internet access in a few years.

  • maplesaga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Something is happening, first the age verification and now this. They’re setting up to verify identities online I presume?

    • Australis13@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m more wondering that if all consumer network routers have to be made in the US (e.g. forcing people to use the ISP-provided one), it makes it easier for them to utilise the ISP’s backdoors for monitoring of people’s LANs. If that’s actually the goal, then the next logical step would be to deny anyone access using a third-party router or ISP-provided router that didn’t have their firmware.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      They’re setting up to verify identities online I presume?

      To track online activities.

      To ensure nobody is doing anything the government (or its corporate funders) don’t like.

      Look at the Project2025 manifesto and see how much they want people’s activities to be controlled.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      On Linux you can just turn the kernel into a router with a few commands. Its actually very cool.

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      For anyone looking into this, I recommend picking up a “network appliance” PC. They’re low-spec, often fanless, and come with 4 Ethernet ports. You can often get them for roughly the same price as a router. You will need to provide your own WiFi AP with this method.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hmmm… so if you install a router os on a pc that’s made outside the US, will that make you a criminal?

  • Antaeus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 days ago

    Cisco is made in China. Ubiquiti, Vietnam or Thailand I think.

    How is this going to work?

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      If we see a reversal of the policy soon then it was a standard playbook policy announcement to receive corrupt bribery money from some big manufacturers and importers. If we don’t, it may very well have been with no takers anyway.

      We’ve seen it plenty before (within the last year). Like tarrifs, then exclusions, etc.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Smuggling? Setting up a factory in Florida that reboxes routers and slaps “Made In America” stickers on them? Resale/referb router prices going through the roof?

      Take your pick.

    • IratePirate@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      So at what point do they ban all new computers not made domestically?

      FTFY. It’s the same thing.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      well pricing them out of reach of the population wasn’t working, so soon

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    All the thrift stores here throw them away. I’ve got dozens of them, variety of all types piled up in the closet because why the fuck the not? Fucking knew they’d come after them eventually.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 days ago

    Protectionism at its finest! What should the rest of the world make of US consumer routers? All good? No backdoors letting friendly people in?

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      What should the rest of the world make of US consumer routers?

      I’ll let you know when they actually make one

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    designating all consumer routers manufactured outside the U.S. as a security risk

    So this is horseshit, right?

    First of all, ALL routers from ANY country are a security risk? Every single other nation is trying to make Spyware for the average American consumer? Doubt.

    Second, they are extremely concerned with all consumers’ security from foreign actors to the point it needs an outright ban on hardware to protect us. God forbid I buy an AVM router from Germany and open up my home networking to German Spies. What if they find out I sometimes visit porn websites and yourube!?

    Third, that the US government, themselves, are trustworthy and wont force backdoors into systems to allow them unfettered access into private networks, something that they HAVE TRIED TO AND SUCCEEDED TO DO IN THE PAST. And also something that they are very clearly opening the door for with all of these legal pushes toward requiring age verification software and OS’s. They want to ban foreign routers so that you have to buy routers from companies that they can control. They can ask, coerce and force them to give them access behind the scenes for some bullshit excuse (“protect the kiddies”, “law enforcement”, “national security”, “terrorism”), force them to not tell the public, and then “secretly” monitor every device in the entire country. They are almost certainly already doing this with a significant number of US manufacturers and software developers.

    Fuck these fascists.

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      I find it unlikely to be about security. Either it is about control or about money (pressure to induce bribery for lifting), or a combination of both.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      It is entirely true that all models from all manufacturers are compromised by spy agencies. However the worst offender by far is Cisco even though they’re “American”.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        It is entirely true that all models from all manufacturers are compromised by spy agencies.

        I think there’s a little bit of space between “spy agencies employ systems professionals that know the guts of a component’s security and tricks to bypass it” and “every device firmware has a double super secret protocol for sidestepping all of its security features”.

        However the worst offender by far is Cisco even though they’re “American”.

        Sure. I’m willing to believe that Cisco, specifically, has relationships with the Five Eyes network such that they make monitoring their traffic easier. Even then, there’s limits. One thing to say techniques exist to bypass security. Another entirely to know what those techniques are and whether they’re practical for application at universal scale.

        One of the more chronic problems that big spy agencies have is sifting through all the spam and bullshit and empty chatter. Decryption takes time. And you can’t monitor everything, everywhere, all at once. The bigger sins of Cisco are in how they expedite access on behalf of their agency partners, not that they fail to produce perfectly hack-proof hardware.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think you guy are forgetting Occam Razor… the most likely scenario (least assumptions) here is that some inept appointee from the orange pedo thought this would be a good idea and pushed it with the research, planning and preparation we all put at farting after eating Taco Bell

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      There’s a line about “… unless they have a waiver.”

      That’s the razor, it’s gatekeeping for who can get your special permit.