• blitzen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 个月前

    The Michael Richards incident was a literal one time event, albeit a terrible one. There were zero instances before and zero instances after that suggest Richards is racist. Everything since then Michaels has done suggests he’s exceedingly remorseful over it.

    I am not excusing it in the least, but I don’t think it’s even close to fair to compare him to someone currently supporting the genocide in Palestine.

    • Solumbran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 个月前

      You don’t really throw a racial slur “just one time”; but when you try to not use it in public, one slip up happens.

          • blitzen@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 个月前

            I’m not saying Richards was funny, I’m saying there is a difference on the baddie scale between someone who vocally and current supports genocide and someone who said something racist once twenty years ago.

            • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 个月前

              Nuance, man. Some people just can’t compare qualitatively and can’t understand nuance.

              Like the stein voters who couldn’t do harm reduction and just threw their votes in the chipper.