• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    There are four main flavors

    • Debian - For every day
    • Red Hat - For work
    • Arch - To tinker and learn
    • OpenSuSe - To German
      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        habe noch keine German influence gesehen

        haven’t seen any German influence yet.

        Got it.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        3 days ago

        The popular Debian based distros are up to date. That said, core Debian stable is indeed boring, but sometimes boring and stable is what you need.

        • ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          I use Kubuntu LTS for that exact reason. Even though I am an experienced Linux user for over 20 years, I don’t have time to fuck around fixing my PC when something goes wrong. It’s stable and it works. And, yes I game on my PC and it’s doing just fine with my 3070 RTX NVidia card with the drivers provided by Ubuntu through their 3rd party driver system. No hassle, no crashing, just me using my computer doing the things I need to do.

        • parzival@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Its not even stable though😭 I spent 6 hours fixing my networking on my debian 13 stable server, after it randomly got 90 percent packet loss with no explanation

      • Baggie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        Definitely a brick of an operating system, boring as hell, but reliable and has been that way since ancient times.

    • craftrabbit@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Also the additional flavours of

      • Nix – whole OS determined by 1 file
      • Gentoo – Arch but it takes longer
      • Alpine – small and simple
      • Slackware? – for old people
      • Void?? – like Alpine but not small and simple
      • LFS??? – like Gentoo but takes longer
      • AOSP??? – not even really Linux anymore
      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Gentoo – Arch but it takes longer

        Supports full binary versions since december 2023.

        Slackware? – for old people

        Aka people who know what they’re doing and what they want, noted.

          • _stranger_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Adding a binary package host allows Portage to install cryptographically signed, compiled packages. In many cases, adding a binary package host will greatly decrease the mean time to package installation and adds much benefit when running Gentoo on older, slower, or low power systems.

      • ragas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Gentoo really has nothing to do with arch. Gentoo in my opinion is more like Debian with compiling and rolling release.

        And what about Fedora? Last I checked it was wildly popular.

        • craftrabbit@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Gentoo is just frequently cited as the “next step up” from Arch and also funny.

          And Fedora is bucketed into the Red Hat flavour.

      • NostraDavid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nix – whole OS determined by 1 file

        * Can be determined by 1 file. Or one file and a .lock file. Or even more files. Your pick, really.

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          the most BSD Linux

          Try CRUX.

          (Or KISS/Carbs, Side, Parch, Aeryn, Shebang, … and there are other new ones I’ve forgot the name of, that have either BSD userland or BSD style ports packaging systems).

          I don’t know which is “the most BSD Linux”, but I suspect “BSD people” may not be the most familiar with the distroverse, having their own things to tend to.

          • tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            …having their own things to tend to.

            “NetBSD!” “No, OpenBSD!” “No, FreeBSD!”