Distributed as in non centralized. Many people feel like there is nothing they can do to contribute to meaningful change, especially with how spread out Americans are, but surely there has got to be something.
Using the trend of blocking traffic as an example, I think a coordinated effort to not just block a highway in one city, but to block state routes and other arteries in many places would be more effective. Instead of one city having bad traffic for a day, it would be many towns and it would be harder to dismiss as a local problem if people across the states are engaging.
Something I liked about the response to LA was people showing up at hotels where occupiers were staying and driving them out. There’s a sort of group denunciation happening, and then also it just makes it hard to do the work - they don’t have enough sleep, they have to travel farther to the intended area of action.
What about other ways to foul logistics? And what are other ways to shame/demoralize people supporting the regime? Totalitarians require everyday people to carry out their orders. The more people we peel away or disillusion the less control a totalitarian can exert.
Be happy and grow a supportive, active, and independent community network of helpers
Not civil disobedience, but I agree. Unfortunately creating communities is probably a bigger ask than getting arrested in a protest.
Birthstrike - stop reproducing
People are already doing that. Birth rates globally have been trending downwards for decades, but in the US they’ve been below replacement for over fifty years.
It’s not as bad as someplace like South Korea, which is already doomed and past the point of no return, but it’s still not great, and we’re headed towards the same end if we don’t turn things around very soon.
-
reproduction isn’t a choice for some people. that’s fucked up but it’s cold & hard reality.
-
this just increases the ratio of parents in the next generation that are shitty people, effectively strengthening fascist movements by increasing the proportionment of lil hitlers vs everyone else in the kindergarten class.
i think this strategy is highly problematic if you think about it for literally even just a second, and i say that as someone who would never voluntarily have kids.
isn’t a choice for some people
Previous poster isn’t talking about those people; but about people who do have a choice and why they should decline.
this just increases the ratio of parents in the next generation that are shitty people
Correct. But that doesn’t justify dropping a child into the dumpsterfire we’re turning our planet into just so they can serve as a footsoldier in the fight against it. Children aren’t sacrificial lambs.
effectively strengthening fascist movements by increasing the proportionment of lil hitlers vs everyone else in the kindergarten class.
What’s to say good parenting can combat that to enough of an extent to actually make a difference? It’s not rare for two genuinely good people to produce a little hellspawn that grows up to be a lil hitler despite their parent’s best efforts. Good parenting is certainly an important factor, but that’s far from a guarantee your kid will do good with their lives. They could just as well be the next actual Hitler.
We can’t outbreed stupid or evil. If abstaining from having a kid for the sake of protecting that kid from an increasingly dire hellscape is some kind of failure to delay humanity’s downfall, then humanity isn’t something that should be preserved.
-
If every blue state stopped paying federal taxes simultaneously they’d be fucked. Tax season isn’t for another sixish months, just saying.
It has to be the employees not the state because companies withhold it and remit directly to the IRS. Not saying you should do this, but if you increase your withholdings then it won’t go to the IRS. Though you will owe it in April and may have to pay penalties for underwitholding.
Opting out of consumerism. Not that it’s legal disobedience, but it’s certainly social disobedience that would get the attention of and take power from the corporations who control our politicians. Yes we can’t stop buying everything completely, going to a barter system for everything is not feasible. But we can at least stop buying so much crap.
Yep
Modern American economy doesn’t give a shit about labor strikes.
But a consumer strike?
Everyone literally cutting out all extraneous purchases and cancelling every subscription except utilities…
That would get the wealthy’s attention.
Can’t speak for your household, but ours is already there, by necessity. Shit’s gotten too damned expensive. At this point we’re buying only what we actually need with an eye on how to make it last as long as possible. And me and my wife make $140k combined.
Modern American economy doesn’t give a shit about labor strikes.
How do you figure that?
The old ways are being forgotten
That’s true, but at the same time, aren’t most people already boycotting what they can? I think anyone who feels bad about supporting shitty companies are already avoiding them when they can, and if they can’t, well there isn’t much more to do until we hit mutual aid networks.
I’m not talking about boycotting shitty companies, though. Just like, boycotting capitalism. To the degree that’s even possible. We need food, shelter, and utilities.
But clothes? Repair, swap, thrift.
Entertainment? Cancel streaming services, stop going out to movies. Don’t use social media sites that make money by showing you ads. Play cards or board games, read or listen to books from the library. Trade things with friends when you get bored of what you have instead of just buying new stuff. Touch grass.
I’m not saying I do all of this stuff or that it would be easy, but lots of people doing this consistently would make a much bigger difference than boycotting shitty companies piecemeal.
You need to extricate yourself from your bubble if you think American’s are meaningfully boycotting anything.
target would like a word
Well, that’s part of my point. Everyone who stopped eating at Chick Fil A stopped 10+ years ago, everyone else doesn’t care. Anyone willing to boycott is already boycotting, and they can’t boycott any harder until we have a method of acquiring necessities from somewhere else.
Ah! Perfect example as I won’t touch Chick Fil A. :)
So yes, those who care and are politically aware are boycotting what they can, but the vast majority of Americans neither care or are aware.
I don’t think there’s some fraction of people who are ethically driven, and the rest don’t care. Everyone sits on multiple spectra for what they care about, and where their thresholds for acting are. Most people are under the pump for cost of living, and that’s pretty dominant when you’re on the verge of poverty. Get those people a bit more stability, and they’ll have more capacity to care about broader ethical ssues…
Everyone sits on multiple spectra for what they care about, and where their thresholds for acting are
Right, so what would push people over that threshold now?
- Its different for everyone, and there will usually be multiple influencing factors, not just one big one, but
- I already pointed out one big one in my last sentence.
Worked against Bud Light and Cracker Barrel. Not sure how effective it is elsewhere. Maybe Target?
Step 1. Enter the main office of a corporation en masse
Step 2. Refuse to leaveNot against the idea in spirit, but that’s not distributed and not feasible for many people who live far from corporate HQs.
Eh? Corporate HQs are all in city centres, and the vast majority of people live in cities…
Filling empty beer bottles with hand sanitizer. Pass them out at marches so people don’t get sick.
With a cloth coming out the top to wipe your hands? And a lighter to keep warm?
you need to fill them mostly with Styrofoam, actually.
Exactly. Wouldn’t want to catch cold.
I have been fantasizing about figuring out where epstien is buried, digging his evil ass up and catapulting his corpse onto the white house lawn.
That would force them to release the files. It is so outrageous that it would get national attention, and people would support it because RELEASE THE FUCKING EPSTIEN FILES.
I think this would actually have the opposite effect. It’s essentially the Dead Cat Strategy. That’s a political tactic where if you’re losing an argument and can’t see a way to turn it around, just throw a dead cat on the table. Now everyone is suddenly talking about the dead cat, instead of the argument you were losing. It refers to when a politician is losing a debate, so they just start making outrageous statements to grab attention and divert the debate away from the argument.
Epstein’s body would be a dead cat, as news would divert towards covering that instead of covering the files.
This sounds like copium even if it was realistic. The idea that Epstein is some kind of anti-fascist silver bullet fundamentally misunderstands how fascist movements work.
Make friends with random people, especially conservatives.
Make lots of money, which can be used for many useful things.
Buy real estate in your communtity.
Start a business in your community.
Develop personal relationships with your elected officials or other powerful people.
Get elected to positions of power, even if just a school board member or neighborhood council representitive.
So you’re suggesting the American Dream is the only way to beat an American nightmare?
More or less, yes.
In order to make meaningful change, you need power. So go get power.
Blocking traffic will only turn people away at best and get you run over at worst.
Maybe it depends on who you are blocking.
The ones I don’t understand is when they just block and entire interstate or main road. Like, why? You are keeping other random people like parents and kids from going home? How is that helping? It just makes them all REALLY mad at you and your cause.
But if you blocked specific vehicles, like ICE vans. Now we are actually doing something productive.
Oh, definitely, unfortunately that’s rarely what they do.
And I’d add this… they rarely protest where they need to be protesting as well.
Netanyahu isn’t even AWARE of the Gaza protests in the US and wouldn’t give two shits if he was aware, but you take it to Israel and protest in Tel Aviv? That will get the attention you need.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/aug/25/israel-protest-tel-aviv-army-war-gaza
https://www.opb.org/news/series/racenw/race-northwest-united-states-jordan-lund-portland/
reminder to everyone that that’s why Jordan doesn’t like BLM.
Oh, god no, as stated, stories like this are why I don’t like BLM:
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2015/12/31/dunbar-slayings-prompt-a-rethinking-of-black-lives-matter/
These dead kids in Chicago were met with SILENCE from BLM. Their lives and deaths didn’t matter because they did not fit the BLM narrative.
“The activists working to protest rogue cops must work just as hard to shatter indifference toward the violence plaguing normal citizens. Or else black lives south and west still won’t matter. Only our escape from the city will.”
Unless the perpetrator is a cop, specifically a white cop, BLM is dead fucking silent. Which means they aren’t really BLM. They’re BLM*
*When it fits our agenda.
Right, that was just an example of things anyone with a couple friends could do locally that would still accumulate at scale.
