• agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    On the contrary, my mind is constantly open and I’ve read quite a bit. But what I’ve read generally falls into three categories:

    1. Totally hand-wavey, concerned more with guiding principles than actionable models. No attempt is made to describe how to devise a non-hierarchical system that fulfills the needs of the people.

    2. Delusional, based entirely on people suddenly being way more cooperative and efficient in group decisions than they’ve ever actually been observed to be en masse.

    3. Inconsequential, “non-hierarchical” is abstracted so far that most modern democracies could be described as such after relatively minor reform. These seem the most practical to me, like the proponents actually considered the mechanics of how the system would work in the material world.

    I’m not trying to dismiss it, but everything I’ve read either makes it sound like a fantasy, or a minor change.

    • bearboiblake@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      Again, humans are incredibly co-operative, but we’ve all been subject to brainwashing from childhood against our better natures. We can act against that brainwashing. It absolutely requires a social revolution - we need to be honest about our society and culture. If you think co-operation is delusional, I’d recommend learning a bit about paleolithic and neolithic human societies.

      Anyways, I’m sure you won’t change your mind, the brainwashing is real, I get it, it’s tough. As long as you’re anti-capitalist, that’s fine with me, you’ll get there.