Do you think those debates are for real and not a show that ends with whatever has been decided elsewhere?
The houses don’t need to know because they don’t do the planning.
Since the EU does the same thing at the same time, after it was not a problem for years, the origin for these laws must lie elsewhere.
The control isn’t complete until VPNs are controlled. Everybody evading the ban will help to make the case that VPNs have to be regulated, too.
Not to forget the sky over the ocean.
but with something like Mastodon, it doesn’t really work. Like this bill was written and passed by people who don’t know shit about fuck about tech. Several Lemmy and Mastodon instances have shut down/Geoblocked the UK because of this
So they knew what they were doing. Age verification is about removing all sources that can’t be controlled.
To me war and invasion is synonymous.
I think so too. That’s not the same as denying the invasion.
Where do you get that from? The opposite of telling the truth is not telling only lies.
The information about the other countries is also not entirely wrong. There is just enough false information that the majority draws enough wrong conclusions.
I don’t agree with MOVE, I agree with you that something like MOVE will be used.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I meant jamming with “distortion device”.
I agree that the MOVE approach will be used on groups of insurgents. But what will be done if insurgents operate alone or in small groups?
ICE or riot police won’t be deployed against citizens with guns. At best SWAT teams or the army but I think it will be drones.
you haven’t seen the fibre cables that drives use?
no cables are needed
but it’s not the weapon you think it is.
In which way? I think the fibre cables are limiting in an urban environment. Without, the pilots can stay in an office and the drones can be conveniently deployed from planes and helicopters or carrier drones.
anticivilian warfare that’s actually being used
What do you mean? The deployed soldiers? That would end like Afghanistan. People would cover, wild shootouts would occur.
If you take drones, no cables are needed because any distortion device can be taken out directly since there is no frontline that limits movements. Then the drone can fly to the target and kill it.
I was thinking more of Ukraine style frontline drones that take out individual soldiers.
Insurgents will be 2-3% of the population. That’s like targeting the black prison population or the people who oppose vaccines. With the right framing people will look away like they do with black prisoners.
Insurgents can hide, but they cannot communicate or move. That war will not be like Afghanistan.
And if shops keep track of who buys what it becomes difficult to feed hiding insurgents.
Where are the people who were on Reddit before the bots? Lemmy is too small but supposedly the biggest alternative.
So people must still be on Reddit because there is no other place unless they make do with Telegram, X and Discord.
That’s just hobbyists happy to explain something.
If the AI is good enough how can you tell?
They who have guns want the police state.
It’s all the lefties who haven’t listened to Marx who don’t have guns.
No, please correct me.
Drones are perfect for asymmetrical warfare. They wait somewhere until a surveillance drone detects somebody who leaves their allowed area. Then they fly there and kill them.
It’s only important to protect urban centers. Insurgents can camp in the woods as long as they want. An insurgency won’t disrupt normal operations once enough drones are available.
drones are not effective against an insurgency.
Why? They can kill anybody who moves outside their zone that is needed for work and living. Whoever has arms and moves in the open can be killed. What can an insurgency do?
given drivers are not an issue
All the Linux phones run on outdated hardware because that’s the main problem.
To me, that is a conspiracy. Turning it into a business is the way to remove political oversight, but the profits don’t hurt.