I feel that post hoc reasoning is not a flaw. It helps build a coherent moral framework. To the hammer, everything is a nail. Why limit the philosophical tools pre or post any need i guess

For me, I have a mental knapsack full of philosophical approaches.

A situations scope, impact, and effect may demand a different philosophical framework to meet my or the groups goals.

There are some ideologies I won’t touch or entertain. There are some I can only accept under very specific terms and timelines. I have my favorites and more that I’m friendly with.

So ya, a sort of meta-utlitarianism!

I like my philosophy flexible

Thank you. I didn’t know i was waiting for Cooklang, but I am glad you connected me!