I once got into it with a dev who had written an Arduino library. I reported a compile bug, and he said my environment must be broken. In fact, it was because the headers in the library were set for #include 'arduino.h', not Arduino.h. Which would work fine on the default settings for Windows and Mac, but not Linux.

Client data absolutely is encrypted in TLS. You might be thinking of a few fields sent in the clear, like SNI, but generally, it’s all encrypted.

Asymmetric crypto is used to encrypt a symmetric key, which is used for encrypting everything else (for the performance reasons you mentioned). As long as that key was transferred securely and uses a good mode like CBC, an attacker ain’t messing with what’s in there.

I think you’re confusing the limitations of each building block with how they’re actually implemented together in TLS. The whole suite together is what matters for this thread.

Public key crypto, properly implemented, does prevent MITM attacks. TLS does do this, and that’s all that matters here

Kohlberg’s stages of moral development and experiments around it suggests a lot of people fall into it. Many get stuck in level 2, which can be summerized (greatly simplifying here) as “the law says so”.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg's_stages_of_moral_development

It’s debatable if the model as a whole is correct, but they did find an awful lot of adults using this method.

Never looked into the inventor of these things. Was not expecting English Mr Rogers.

I’ve seen these things in action. They’re worth it.

The connections aren’t. This didn’t matter much for spinning platters, but it does for SSDs.

Sometimes, Trump does stumble into a true statement.

There’s no way it’d be kept under wraps. This White House is leaky as hell. There’s pretty good chances of another journalist being invited to a Signal chat on the matter.

GHW Bush was a far savvier political animal than Vance. He had a lot of experience by then. Vance only first held office in 2023, and he mostly wrote books and worked for investment firms before then.

It can use treated waste water, so it’s not that specialized.

No. The idea is pure hopium. His health clearly isn’t good, but Vance wouldn’t waste a second to take the oath of office.

You know we can find other candidates to back than Newsom, right?

Thanks, corrected.

He went on Joe Rogan’s Charlie Kirk’s show and said he doesn’t think trans women should be in sports. Solidarity only goes one way for him.

Edit: the deleted comment under this by Madzielle is the work of a coward. Post for real and stand by your (shitty) opinion. Don’t delete it immediately just so it hits my inbox and you suffer no community consequences from it.

FWIW, I gave YaCy a try a while back, and I agree with the article on that one. Shit tier results that make ancient AltaVista look good. Might be fine for intranet search. I like the idea of its distributed hosting, but pass on this one.

Other poster mentioned SearXNG, and while I haven’t delved into that too much, it’s probably worth a check. Pass on YaCy.

Everyone forgets about WebDAV.

It’s a little jank, but it does work on Windows. If you copy a file in, it doesn’t show up in the file manager until you refresh. But it works.

It’s also multithreaded, which isn’t the case for SMB. This is especially good if you host it on SSDs.

Not sure what they need to do more of. Another poster mentioned their datacenter CPU, and there’s plans for a desktop chip. It’s not obvious yet that traditional Windows PC customers are going to accept ARM, though I hope they do.

Except none of these companies are making money. Like almost literally none. We’re about three years into the LLM craze, and nobody has figured out how to turn a profit. Hell, forget profit, not bleeding through prodigious piles of cash would be a big deal.

What AI companies are profitable? Besides the one selling shovels in a gold rush.

They already have ARM development spun up.