Better than Pierce IMO

Franklin Pierce was a better POTUS and that guy was the worst.

originally yes they were but by the time Paul’s writing becomes cannon it no longer is. That’s the 80s?

Yes, 2000 years ago the ethnic Jews that were Christians considered themselves to be Jews. That ceased to be the case within a few years as Paul’s ideas are adopted and the people joining aren’t Jewish and do not follow Jewish laws and traditions.

It’s a new faith because they frame it as such. If you were Christian and called yourself a Jewish person you would get weird looks.

It was a sect of Judaism at one point but that was thousands of years ago.

if you are the only person that uses it then it is not unisex.

For those in a similar state watch it on desktop mode. This oddly might be the most compelling narrative for why this happened.

If you have to sit and you have to go immediately you appreciate those that were considerate enough to engage in this simple act of decency.

The notion that Christ was God’s son whose death redeems the world of sin? The entirely different relationship with God that Christians have that derives from that concept. It’s why Christians are not a sect of Judaism.

Why are you calling them sects if you are so well educated?

If you can’t be civil you should take a break ffs

It’s the same thing. If Christ’s death doesn’t redeem sin what’s the point of Christ’s death?

It’s what makes them a new faith.

Ok? Im not sure what your point is. The redemption from sin is literally the one thing they all accept.

Oh if you mean the wealthy should have a degree of fear that I agree with

There is an understanding if what “Christian” means. Your argument, if valid, would mean there is no definition for the majority of concepts.

But I’ll tell you that you are correct if it makes you fell better.

If you could find an actual denomination that didn’t accept the redemption of Jesus and accepted his religious message and called you would have a group of Jews from the first two centuries CE. They did not see themselves as a new faith separate of Judaism.

There never was an example of No True Scotsman you just have a flawed understanding of Christianity and this logical flaw you improperly cited.

Im not sure I entirely agree but this is a compelling notion

We can just take the mic away though. We do not have to physically torture him. Making him live out life on the margins of poverty should be enough.

I hope you feel better.

The post I replied to said he does not live in fear.

You can tone it down. Not everyone needs to be a victim of a crime against humanity because they are racist and shitty.

You need to have an actual example to present a counterfactual. You cannot presume one might exist and then argue as if your claims have validity.

If you can find an actual example of a Christian denomination that does not see Christ’s death on the cross as an act that redeems the world of sin you can press the No True Scotsman claim but it needs to be real and it isn’t.

None of the apostles said this directly. It’s literally the central dogmatic point everyone shares post schism. If Christ’s death isn’t redemptive there’s no point to the faith at all.

I’m ok with him being fired for overt racism. We don’t need to make him fear for his life though I would be okay with taxing the shit out of him forcing him to move to a less exclusive place.