I hear you on the frustration with the errors and the Billet Labs situation; those were legitimate issues. But I think there’s a difference between holding someone accountable and writing them off permanently.

The thing is, LMG did take concrete steps after the GN video:

• They paused uploads for a week
• Established an error-checking team (ECC squad)
• Have been building out their lab infrastructure (their PSU testing and articles can be really neat)

Are they perfect now? No. But if we don’t acknowledge when people/companies make genuine efforts to improve, what’s the incentive for anyone to try?

I’m not saying you have to watch LTT or trust everything they say. But the “his opinion literally means nothing to me” stance feels pretty absolute for a situation where they’ve at least attempted course correction. Most of us have professional screw-ups we’ve learned from. I think the question is whether the response was adequate, not whether mistakes disqualify someone forever.

It’s also an out for if for whatever reason, I am misremembering and am wrog

This is a source fyi

https://time.com/7269166/dark-enlightenment-history-essay/

Not saying I disagree, but source? Only asking because I see a lot of philosophys subscribed to Thiel and those lizard people.