

Then it wouldn’t be inadvertent anymore, right?
Negative.
I am a meat popsicle.


Then it wouldn’t be inadvertent anymore, right?


Had my head and face shaved in Toulons when the submarine I was on pulled in there.
I don’t remember my barber looking anything like this, though.
Did I get ripped off?


Where did the question say the person was negligent?
Now you’re adding details not in the question.
Inadvertently means accidentally. Accidents, by their definition, are not purposeful or intentional.
Do you normally make a practice of blaming accidents on people more than you blame your enemies?


Inadvertent is an accident. People don’t deserve blame or anger for accidents.
If an enemy hurts you, it’s malicious.
I have nerve damage in my hands so typos are a huge part of typing on a phone for me. I’ve gotten in the habit of going back and rereading a time or two before hitting post because there will always be a few words that are unrecognizable.
(For instance, before I went back just now, “hitting” was “hjrrjbd”)
Assimilation by the Corpsefather is the only option to give you 1000 years of unfettered freedom first.
Go big or go home. I pick the Corpsefather so that I can spend 1000 years free of resource wars, VR hellscapes, and alternate dimension experiments.
Hell, after 1000 years of accumulated experience, I’ll probably already be insane by the time Dad shows up anyway.


Did it the moment he posted. He’s been escalating his hateful bile on instances across lemmy for days. This is not a surprise.


Way to go giving the hateful incel who posts about having awful mental health and how “the bitches will pay” access to more firearms resources.
Very responsible of you. Really giving gun owners a good name.


OP has a history of mass shooter posts, incel shit, abusive language toward women, and numerous threats to hurt people.
Please do not give him any information that could lead to his obtaining a firearm.


His tag says “Batshit Fucking Psycho” for me.


Was banned permanently from Reddit for correctly identifying a certain South African billionaire’s political leanings.

Pretty crazy, isn’t it? An entire continent of ancient ice just floating there.

Yep, I took this in 2010 on ICEX, a biannual exercise by British and American subs. We were up there for about a week doing acoustic testing and helping scientists measure ice thickness, drift, and a bunch of other stuff.
We didn’t make it to where you could stand on the North Pole, but we did drive across it while submerged.


You’re not thinking nearly dystopian enough. Want to play a game? Need a cloud gaming subscription. Want to send an email? Add Gmail to your Google subscription for $5.99 a month. Want enough speed to stream higher than 720p video? Gotta pay your ISP for the bandwidth and YouTube (Google again!) for the access. You will rent everything from the system.


The meshtastic network only has a max data throughput of 28.8kbps. If you’re looking to do something more than text, you’re looking in the wrong place.
In my case, decentralized communications that are vastly more disaster and conflict proof than internet and cell is exactly what I’m looking for.


First device Benn goes into in this video is how to build a repeater from a cheap Home Depot solar light, but you can easily scale up with a larger solar panel / bigger battery for a repeater you’re going to stick up on a hill somewhere or something.


In the last week or so, I’ve really kicked my goal of getting solar powered mesh repeaters placed around my town / local area into high gear.
I don’t think we can wait any longer.


Regions will be walled off by censorship / content laws, freely accessible information will be a thing of the past, you’ll have to pay a subscription for anything you want to do, and you will own nothing.


How about stylistically and thematically consistent? Surely, Nolan could have at least tried for that?
Again, multiple other characters in the trailer who are of the same status level, time period, and culture, but no consistency.
Egger’s The Northman was an equally mythologically interlaced tale, but you don’t see any vacuformed plastic there, do you?
But it isn’t the same argument.
When DJs sample, they choose the samples, choose the pitch and playback speed, and choose where and when to put the sample in their songs.
There is no human intentionality in AI-created music. No one decided what the song should sound like, it’s a mash of what an algorithm calculates is the most predictable next sound based on its prompt, and it calculates what’s next by illegally using the intellectual properties of real humans.
Whoever used this argument with you isn’t arguing in good faith.
Edit - I didn’t even answer the overarching question. You’ll find, in almost all cases, that it isn’t the same argument because one or more things that factor into the decision will have changed. Very rarely is a situation entirely static, and if some variables have changed, then the entire argument must be reconsidered.