I advocate for logical and consistent viewpoints on controversial topics. If you’re looking at my profile, I’ve probably made you mad by doing so.
So then yes to everything I said before then. Yes it was all a coincidence. Yes it was sold at exactly the right time after purchasing it exactly the right point in a VERY tight period of time. Totally out of the blue. Several hundred times given her stock portfolio.
Listen, if you’re not even going to pretend to be believable, then I don’t think we need to continue this.
So then logically, she voted with her party after her husband both purchased and later sold stock at the exact correct times (by your own admission) to profit off things both coming and going.
And all of the rest of those listings are all… Just lucky. Over and over again.
And somehow, even without those listings, the performance of her portfolio is… Just a coincidence and shrewd trading at a level that outperforms everyone else thousands of times over.
Got it.
But yeah, everyone else is easily fooled by Trump somehow. In 2011. Where the investigation was carried out by 60 Minutes for some reason.
Brilliant deductive work.
This is some MAGA-level bending yourself into knots to suck yourself off.
There are multiple sources that you could quite easily look up yourself, but here is a website detailing most of them including dates and the exact trades and the amounts.
https://insider-trading.org/the-nancy-pelosi-insider-trading-controversy/
Bad title. He’s criticizing the state of free speech in America citing the Jimmy Kimmel cancellation and people fired / cancelled over Charlie Kirk speech.
I’ve had it fail to load a lot of stuff today. Something’s definitely up.
Well, to be perfectly fair, I am un-American. Being a Canadian and all…
:)