The five biggest Dutch cities are urging the government to let them ban fatbikes, e-scooters and other motor-powered vehicles from cycle lanes to prevent “total chaos,” the Telegraaf reported on Wednesday. “Cycle lanes should be a safe place for all cyclists, not just the biggest, strongest and fastest,” the cities’ transport chiefs said in a joint statement to parliament’s infrastructure committee, which is debating road safety on Thursday. Local authorities have long warned that cycle lanes are overloaded and were...
There are regulations, but they are not well enforced. Electric bikes (of any type) are allowed to assist active pedaling up to 25 km/h and can have a motor with a power of up to 250 watts. In that case, the same rules apply as for a normal bicycle. The issue is that they often go faster and that they often don’t require active pedaling. In that case, they legally fall under the same category as mopeds and need a license plate and have different rules applied to them, but in reality, many owners don’t follow these rules. I guess banning them from cycling lanes is easier to enforce than enforcing the legal limits.
I’m just guessing, but I think it’s because with a throttle it would be considered a “snorfiets” (light moped with a maximum speed of 25 km/h), which would mean:
minimum age of 16
license plate
insurance
drivers license
different traffic rules (mostly the same as bicycles, as opposed to 45 km/h mopeds)
I think they wanted to make electric bicycles with assisted pedaling an attractive alternative to noisy and polluting petrol fueled mopeds.
Also, we’re talking about a country with more bicycles than citizens, so treating them as “snorfiets” would mean that a lot of cyclist would be forced to share the road with faster motorized vehicles on some stretches of road (though not many), which would create other safety issues.
There are regulations, but they are not well enforced. Electric bikes (of any type) are allowed to assist active pedaling up to 25 km/h and can have a motor with a power of up to 250 watts. In that case, the same rules apply as for a normal bicycle. The issue is that they often go faster and that they often don’t require active pedaling. In that case, they legally fall under the same category as mopeds and need a license plate and have different rules applied to them, but in reality, many owners don’t follow these rules. I guess banning them from cycling lanes is easier to enforce than enforcing the legal limits.
I am not sure why pedalling is important for scooters/ebikes to coexist in the cycle path?
Shouldn’t the more important factor be that they should go with the speed of cycle traffic in the path?
I’m just guessing, but I think it’s because with a throttle it would be considered a “snorfiets” (light moped with a maximum speed of 25 km/h), which would mean:
I think they wanted to make electric bicycles with assisted pedaling an attractive alternative to noisy and polluting petrol fueled mopeds.
Also, we’re talking about a country with more bicycles than citizens, so treating them as “snorfiets” would mean that a lot of cyclist would be forced to share the road with faster motorized vehicles on some stretches of road (though not many), which would create other safety issues.