• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    The more impressive thing is that they managed to get the Nvidia upgrade to be backwards compatible with existing Framework 16 models.

    That’s the push I need to really, truly believe they’re committed to the goal of upgradablity. Too many “modular” products have come out where the “upgraded” modules were only available if you bought the newest version of the base product.

    In the next year or so, I’ll probably be buying a new laptop, and this has convinced me that Framework is probably the way to go.

    • SatyrSack@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      The only downside I have seen is that GSYNC will not work. The newer display supports it, put anyone upgrading an older Framework 16 with the new NVIDIA card will have to buy the screen upgrade as well if they need GSYNC.

        • potustheplant@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Nowadays they’re the same thing. Nvidia uses a different name because they like appropriating things, I guess.

          • tekato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            They are not the same thing. GSYNC requires the monitor to be embedded with an NVIDIA controller.

            • potustheplant@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              It does not. You’re talking about the original version GSYNC which required a hw module. That’s no longer the case.

                • potustheplant@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  “g-sync compatible” monitors are still advertised as “g-sync”. So, while you’re technically right, even though nvidia’s marketing differentiates versions, manufacturers only put that in the fine print. Also, if you go back to the original question (“Will freesync work with it?”), if gsync works, freesync works as well. Regardless of which variant of gsync you have.

                  Lastly, framework mentions “we’ve updated our 165Hz 2560x1600 panel to support NVIDIA G-SYNC®” but I’m not sure they’re referring to actually including a coprocessor. It most likely refers to just adding VRR support.

    • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      i’ve had a framework 13 from a time before there was any other type of framework, and it’s a great laptop honestly. ive yet to do big upgrades, but just being able to repair it myself is awesome. one time i dented the chassis around where the power button was. no worries, just changed the input cover and bam 5 minutes later it’s like new.

      my only complaint is that the battery life is atrocious. i heard it’s better (but still not great) on newer models tho

      • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        I have two Intel frameworks, and they both suck in regards to battery life

        Buuut, I just have a big power bank in my backpack. Gives me at least 1 full charge when I’m on the go. And at home I just have a lighter laptop due to smaller battery

        The only thing that pisses me off about framework, is their abysmal software and communication in that regard. It’s basically impossible to get them to acknowledge or fix problems in their firmware

      • randombullet@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        I have a 7840U with a 55HWr battery. I can squeeze out 7 hours. If I’m power using then 5-6 is typical. With the 63WHr battery, you’ll get about 15% more time with it.

        • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          yea, that’s what i meant when talking about newer gens being better

          i have a i5-1240P (with 55WHr battery) and im lucky to get 5 hours while on power saver reading PDFs

    • AliasVortex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      I’ve been rocking a Framework 16 for about a year now and would happily recommend it. It’s a bit more upfront, but I love knowing that I can fix or replace just about anything on it (pretty affordably too). It’s just so refreshing to not have to worry about dumb shit like an obscure power adapter or port forcing my laptop into an early retirement.

      It’s not the lightest laptop I’ve ever had, but realistically not all that much different from my last gaming laptop. Now that I’m not a full time student anymore I could probably get away with one of the smaller models, but the form factor is pretty nice.

      Overall, no major complaints!