• kossa@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not even that. It is a ban of any engine that produces carbon dioxide emissions. So combustion engines are fine as long as the fuel source is carbon neutral.

        Turns out e-fuels are economically unviable? Well, make them viable if you love combustion engines so much. It’s also not a horse-propelled-engine ban, the consumer just does not want horses ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. The allmighty invisible hand of the free market has spoken!

        • Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          IIRC the original diesel engine was designed to run on peanut oil or something. Would that also create CO2 emissions?

          • kossa@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Technically yes, as burning organic matter will produce carbon dioxide. But in the sense of the law no, as the peanuts capture as much CO2 as they emit. I think that is the hypothetical “magic” in efuels.