Every time I hear someone say ‘eh’ in a questioning tone or to mean ‘um actually’ I lose my shit. Or even just to play something down.

Like I literally come to hate the person instantly. Its a very strong feeling on a very small sound.

Instant downvotes if I see it on Lemmy too. HATE IT.

How about all y’all?

  • sicarius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    “It is what it is” when describing a bad situation.
    No, that’s defeatist as hell, it will be whatever it will be when I’ve given it everything I can to make it better.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve read that one differently all this time. I thought It is what it is when it’s handed to me a mess. I can’t change what made it a mess. I can only clean it up. Coming to terms with the fact none of us can change the past and finding blame is pointless if i still have to clean it up.

      EG: when faced with cleaning up a hoarders house. We might not have caused it but it still needs to be cleaned up. That’s when it is what it is so we don’t keep blaming what is usually the dead person found in it who can’t do anything about it anyways.

    • Nuggsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I have come to dislike this saying quite a lot. I have heard friends, family, the general populace utter this saying so often for the last 4-5 years It’s become grating to hear.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      There’s a reason you dislike it so, I wager

      It’s not that deep." – dismisses attempts to expose faulty logic by asserting that logic is not necessary in this particular case.[8]

      “Lies of the Devil.” – used as a response to any fact that threatens the integrity of an individual or group.[9] “Stop thinking too much.” – redirects attention from the topic, idea, or argument at hand to the alleged overuse of thought itself.[10]

      “You clearly care way too much about this topic.” – implies that one’s level of concern or interest in a particular topic or situation is excessive and thus invalidates any further conversation or exploration[2]

      “There are worse things in life to worry about.” – implies that less significant issues are not worth addressing since they are not as significant as other issues and implies that a person’s situation is not significant enough to even warrant discussion or action[11]

      “It’s all good.” – nullifies, without evidence, any possible debate by asserting the issue is already settled.[12][user-generated source?]

      “Here we go again.” – implies that the redundant, cyclical nature of a given disagreement means it will never be resolved.[13]

      “So what? What effect does my action have?” – used to dismiss an individual’s involvement in a larger cause on the grounds that one person is too insignificant to ever have a meaningful impact.[2]

      “Let’s agree to disagree.” – used to stop discussion of an issue rather than attempt to resolve it;[14] may, however, instantiate a dialectic.

      “It is what it is.” – implies that things are unchangeable, therefore there is no point in further discussion.[15]

      “Let people enjoy things.” – purports that criticisms to consumable media are attempts to prevent consumers from enjoying said media.[

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought-terminating_cliché

  • NoWay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Let that sink in…”

    All I think about is what does the sink want, and why is it outside? Any point they were trying to make is now a joke to me. Better to say “think about that for a minute.”

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Often used after saying something that they think is some big profound revelation. No, I was able to understand it all just fine in real time.

  • 315am@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    “I call it as I see it.”

    “I’m just very straightforward and honest.”

    No, you’re a prick. That’s what you are.

  • jaycifer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Most people think ___.” No, unless you’re citing a statistic or roughly quantifying how many anecdotes you’ve heard agreeing with you to support that statement (both of which rarely happen), that’s just your opinion wrapped up in language to avoid actually justifying it.

    Additionally, even if most people think something, I don’t care what most people think. In my experience what most people think vs what the best thing to think is are often not aligned.

  • NerdyKeith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    “No offence, but …” followed by an insult.

    Or starting off with an insult, then ending it with “Just saying …”

    As if these phrases nullify being a dick. If you’re going to be an asshole, own it. Don’t make excuses up.

  • kubok@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Give something 110%”

    Fuck no! 100% is the max. Even that is often too much to ask. Also, what’s in it for me? Your appreciation huh? Well fuck you.

    “I have a challenge for you”.

    No you don’t. You have a problem and want to make it mine. Piss off.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I am going through peoples replies sorta laughing to myself but what you have is the closest thing to something that irritates me. honestly 110 is like all the think out of the box bussiness speak to actualize externalities and such.

  • Okokimup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    “It’s just common sense.” No, it’s usually either an inference you made based on incorrect information, or it’s information you gleaned from your particular environment that not everyone has experienced.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      I catch that shit in political debate all the time.

      “We need some common sense gun laws!”

      The speaker is saying, “Whatever I deem to be common sense is the right way of thinking and anyone disagreeing is an asshole.”

      Think I’ve eliminated that phrase from my comments and speech. I’ve sure tried.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh god; where to start?

    • ‘literally’. It’s best when using the Essex pronunciation of ‘litchally’ for maximum cringey delivery.
    • ‘the ask’. Because ‘request’ or ‘question’ is too hard to say around the pablum.
    • ‘the spend’. Off the car lot, it sounds super-douchey.
    • ‘action this’. Why decide on a verb like ‘do’ or ‘complete’ or ‘revisit’ or ‘prioritize’?
    • ‘begs the question’. Chances are, it really doesn’t. And using that wrongly makes you sound like Mike Tyson saying ‘utilize’

    And now there’s one more:

    • ‘utilize’; or, really, anyone using stilted ‘formal’ phrasing instead of plain English. You don’t sound posh, but you do sound like you’re three kids in a trenchcoat trying to fake being an adult so you don’t get booted from the R-rated movie.
    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      ‘action this’. Why decide on a verb like ‘do’ or ‘complete’ or ‘revisit’ or ‘prioritize’?

      FWIW, ive been questioning our use of a security tool and get blank stares when I say “it doesn’t change anything”. Yet somehow they understand “it generates great data but our process doesn’t action anything”

  • Wytch@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Look, all I’m saying is…”

    Yeah I get it. You’re not going to acknowledge what I just finished saying, you’re not going to respond to the facts that contradict you, and you’re just going to reiterate your oversimplified and shitty opinion, hoping to slip away from this argument that you’re losing.

  • oortjunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Bro” or any variation thereof that assumes familiarity where none exists.

    The artifice offends.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Started getting offended by “bro” sometime in my early 40s. “Dude” is much the same. If we’re friends? I won’t even notice. But if the speaker is older, I feel talked down to. If they’re younger, it feels disrespectful.

      Most of my friends are half my age, I’m fine with that address from them. Other people? “You don’t know me like that.”

      • oortjunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah I also don’t notice it if we’re friends. It’s the assumption of familiarity that bugs me/feels disrespectful, I think…