• PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    regardless of that, it’s never inconvenienced me and it’s still a net gain in readability, since main actually means what it means. have my shell scripts set up to use either one for any repo I’m in automatically.

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Honestly it’s not even about convenience. As far as breaking conventions go, this one has none-to-minimal impact – existing master branches won’t suddenly become invalid. But it’s yet another instance of a subset of a subset of a subset of users getting to enforce their sensibilities for superficial reasons, and ultimately with zero effect regarding the cause they claim to represent; cultural and linguistic differences be damned.

      I’d love to be more specific, but I don’t want the comments to turn into a warzone.

      And don’t pretend like master doesn’t mean what it means.

      • Nat (she/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        People: hey you should think about this a bit and consider changing it to have a small positive impact

        You: 🤬

        Nobody’s forcing you to, nobody’s yelling at you, if you don’t do it it’s not a massive deal, you’re just yelling at clouds. Actually that’s not entirely true; I’m yelling at you because of your absurd overreaction to the mere idea of being a little thoughtful.

        I don’t know if you got it from media, or you heard about this movement and for some reason immediately jumped to “they’re forcing us!”, but you really need to do some self reflection on why you got it so wrong and why you were so quick to do this outburst.