It’s not a bad idea to have energy production near where the energy is being used.
That said, it’s not an either or.
Technology Connections actually did a great video on why using solar panels in place of crops can benefit the crops and actually provides more energy than the crops themselves. At least in the U.S., a huge portion of our crops are used for ethanol in gasoline anyway.
It’s not a bad idea to have energy production near where the energy is being used.
That said, it’s not an either or.
Technology Connections actually did a great video on why using solar panels in place of crops can benefit the crops and actually provides more energy than the crops themselves. At least in the U.S., a huge portion of our crops are used for ethanol in gasoline anyway.
So anything that needs energy should have its own energy supply near where the energy is being used on the body as a design principle?
Sounds good.
Sounds even better than the (relatively) mere incremental improvement in batteries from donut labs.
Even if only painting everything [that needs some electricity] with photovoltaic paint.
Ooooof course it is