• wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    You joke (I think) but community heating schemes off these places would be a good byproduct. Not enough to make them worthwhile, but it would offset their impact.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Do they even make enough heat for that to be viable option? Most computer systems can handle a pretty low temperature before they start having problems because they’re over-heating.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s not going to be steam pipes, but warm water. Maybe 60°C but lots of it. Warm enough for underfloor heating to be sure.

        Biggest problem in my head is that you’d need to design buildings to take advantage of it, and I doubt data centres would be permanent enough to warrant the commitment.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      IIRC that’s being done in some places because it takes care of two issues at once. But certainly not the majority of data centers.

      On a scale several orders of magnitude smaller, it’s also how car heating systems work. Waste engine heat is transferred to the heater core and then air is blown through it. Engine gets cooled, cabin gets heated.

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There are many busy data centers in the southern US states (and other places within a similar proximity to the equator) where community heating would be massively unwelcome for most of the year.

      It’s not a bad idea for cold climate areas that might benefit more from it though. Much better than letting it go to waste while paying extra for heat.