• nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Don’t know why you got downvoted, you’re 100% right. It’s just another layer of abstraction. Like a super high level non-deterministic level of abstraction.

    • Philippe23@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I would say that it’s doesn’t count as a “5G language” if you have to understand and check the underlying “assembly code” it outputs every time you use it.

    • mabeledo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If natural languages were just another level of abstraction, we would already have a successful English like programming language.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        They do. And have been around for years. Theyre not successful because theure full of a lot of fluff. Because its language and not instructional.

    • mx_smith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It seems there a lot of people on Lemmy who dislike anything AI. I have no choice at my work so I have to make the best of it as I’m not leaving my job in this economy.

      • mabeledo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You will learn to like something because you’re being extorted to use it.

        Sounds about right.