The Stratos artificial intelligence datacenter footprint will cover more than 40,000 acres (62 sq miles) over three sites in Box Elder county in north-western Utah. The facility will require about 9GW of power, which is more than the entire state of Utah currently consumes, and suck up a significant amount of water in an area that has been hit by severe drought in recent years.

  • JordanZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This new process will invalidate the objections already raised by Utahns and require each person to pay $15 to file a new complaint. Opponents claim this move is aimed at skirting public disapproval of the project.

    That doesn’t sound problematic at all…

  • Paranoid Factoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    15 hours ago

    What are these data centers to be used for? People say AI, but that’s not specific enough. This shit is surveillance state.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yes its surveillance state being built. Humans will work for Ai in exchange for basic income.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      14 hours ago

      AI for the surveillance state.
      Sort of like the center point of skynet.
      Soon there will be heavily armed autonomous mechs walking the perimeter shooting everything organic within 100m the property border

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    All those shithole Red states are going to get raped by data centers, while the Blue states will force them to pay their way.

    • snapoff@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It’s not that black and white (or red and blue as the case may be). I live in a blue state that is also selling out to data centers under the guise of “job creation”.

    • KC_Royalz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Which honestly needs to happen. Those council members should be fearing for their lives everytime they go outside. But Oleary probably gave them a fat paycheck so they will no longer have to live in the area.

  • MushuChupacabra@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Those data centers are jam packed with copper, and have far less security per kg than you’d think.

    Lots and lots of RAM kicking around too, if you’re a little short.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why are they building these things in dry hot places, surely the one time real estate cost can’t dwarf all the other issues?

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s long-term thinking. I assume it’s like a ponzi scheme: everyone who puts money into something like this thinks they’ll cash out before the problems occur.

      Why do I feel like the ones left holding the bag are going to be the taxpayers/residents somehow?

      • belochka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        If I were justifying my account name, I’d suppose, for the purpose of future appearing interesting, this might be a coverup.

        Such a structure is useful for many things, and while a DC doesn’t have to be that big, a factory producing real things on scale or mass housing or a prepared company town all benefit from being in one place.

        So perhaps it’s being built as a DC, but in fact is going to be like a drone factory, or something equally dystopian-futuristic.

        Or a humongous supercomputer, whatever.

        I’m starting to think along plot lines of science fiction and space operas I’ve seen and read before, they were saying it’s harmful for my development, I didn’t believe them.

        Another option - it’s, yes, a scheme and it won’t get built. Just pump and dump.

    • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s located on the Ruby Pipeline which will serve as the primary source of energy in the short term. Additionally, the data center being classified as a national security site, is located near the Utah Test and Training Range.

      Longer term the facility is looking at nuclear facilities for power and the possibility for a runway and aviation facilities.

      The primary customer of this facility will be the United States military.

      • redsand@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        This is also why Utah. They will staff it with mormons and have fiber runs already

      • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        This. US military is the target market. That people live there, that humans need water to live, and that powering this is going to entirely erase the local agriculture and wider ecosystems are all irrelevant. Deus Vult.~

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      evaporative cooling is better in a arid dry environment. of course this has the side effect of using ALOT more water than neccesarry. utah is already drier than salt.

    • cabillaud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That’s astonishing. How many servers will be running in that thing? Billions? Am I missing something?

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Zero servers are ever gonna run in this thing, it’s just… even more obvious than with all the other fucking absued data center proposals.

    • belochka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If that’s going to be one humongous superstructure, zoned inside, then if this fails, they might get a new city. Superstructures like this are nice, just nobody usually builds them (after 50s and 60s, I suppose) for residential areas.

      One can repurpose the space for multi-story apartments (I suppose ceilings will be much higher than needed), or malls, or literally everything.

      Or factories, if there are problems with exporting orders to southeast Asia.

      If this even gets built.

      Or if it doesn’t fail, then heat and noise pollution, I suppose. And grid load. Not nice.

  • KC_Royalz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Nearly 4,000 people have lodged objections to the project being approved, with this pushback leading to contentious public meetings that Lee Perry, the Box Elder county commissioner, said have left him feeling “physically sick” amid alleged death threats and false accusations.

    Good

    • vathecka@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      “waaahhh death threats” is the usual retort whenever someone gets deserved criticism. Maybe try not doing things that make your constituents want to kill you?

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        To be fair, there are a lot of unhinged people who resort to actual death threats for shit that in no way deserves that level of intensity. It’s probably one of the big reasons why everyone who’s actually smart enough to run a city/state/country is also smart enough not to.

        • CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Local dude here stopped running for office due to death threats against them and their family… small, semi-rural, conservative town, the most important decision for which is… idk, tbh. Can’t honestly imagine why anyone would threaten someone here.

          Which makes me want to run for that position instead. Fuck you people, I don’t have a family to worry about, and I’m not all that worried about dying myself. Solid chance I won’t even know about them since I don’t use social media, and barely check my mail… they’d have to actually act on the threats for it to rise to a level I’d notice, and boy oh boy would I love that. Talk about publicity for the campaign for doing nothing!

  • TechLich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Not all data centres are evil and the issue is nuanced. This one sounds pretty evil though.

    9GW is totally insane and they’re building a gas plant for it instead of renewables (although there’s some solar too). It’s closed loop so the water use fears once it’s running are probably a bit overblown, but the construction itself is going to be ecologically insane. The thing is basically a data city, 162 square km is even larger than a lot of cities and involves building an entire power plant and new energy infrastructure. Building it is a full megaproject and even just noise pollution and the construction impacts will mess with bird migration etc. Obviously the whole thing isn’t going to be full of data centre, some of that space is empty but still.

    It’s also going to have the US military as a major client so… Pretty high up there on the evil scale IMO.

    • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I wouldn’t say it’s nuanced really.

      It’s either those involved with planning the construction are aware of and scale to account for the impact of the ecosystem and population surrounding their project, or they don’t and plot a gigantic building with no environmental accountability. You can do an environmental impact assessment and follow it or you can choose to ignore it or half ass it; it’s pretty cut and dry to me.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wtf would you even want to make something that big.

    Thats a huge geographic vulnerability. You could still make huge ones but spread it out.

    • Insekticus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Greed. That’s the entirety of the answer.

      Whoever ticks and flicks these data centres is paid with grotesque amounts of money to approve this shit and to deal with the fallout.

    • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Good luck. The data center is classified as a national security site and has the Utah Test and Training Range base nearby.

      They’re building it with the intention of military security.