According to the Chinese Facebook group PCDIY! . . .
In a Facebook post, group admin Rose Lee said that the issue has been identified and additionally verified by Phison engineers, thereby giving credibility to the claims.
Ah yes the notably stringent testing and analysis of . . . a Chinese Facebook group
and additionally verified by Phison engineers
A random facebook admin says it was verified by Phison engineers, it doesn’t sound like the reporter actually spoke to anyone from Phison
A random Fediverse commenter is claiming that a random facebook admin says it was verified by Phison engineers.
Nothing is real.
That’s why you shouldn’t use it.
Well this will not get many comments lol
And you wasted space with a comment. Hell you wasted the time it takes to read your useless comment.
And now you no longer exist in my world because I block those things that waste our time.
relax its not that deep
The irony of this comment is painful.
That’s always the way. Publish the big splashy allegations of terrible things on the front page, publish the retraction weeks later down in a footnote somewhere deep inside. It’s obvious which gets more views.
There’s a lot of correlation and speculation going on along with deflecting potential liability.
It would seem if you have one of these drives, make sure the firmware is current, and you should be fine. (Prerelease firmware and heavy load seem to be the “triggers”)
If you don’t plan for hard drive failure, you’ll learn that lesson eventually…
Did the ssd firmware cause failures on other OSes? Did it only have failures when formatted as NTFS? A specific partition table? This article really doesn’t explain anything.
The benelux media tweakers.net has tested the failing ssd on linux, and yes it did fail there too. They were saying temperature might have been a factor since in windows the temperatures were higher than linux, but something was off ye.
If this is a case of prerelease firmware being shipped and killing it under load because of temps, thats baaaddd.
The takeaway: Microsoft forced pre-release firmware onto millions of computers.
They’re lucky only a small percentage were damaged tbf.
Edit: on re-readinf I may have parsed this incorrectly
pre-release engineering firmware on certain SSDs, which may have been triggered by the Windows 11 updates.
It may be more like “for some reason some drives have pre-release software and the update… interacts badly with it?”
The takeaway: Microsoft forced pre-release firmware onto millions of computers.
How you read that article and came to that conclusion is beyond me. No, that’s not the takeaway lol. Microsoft didn’t force the pre-release firmware onto people SSD’s.
We don’t actually know that’s the case though.
What’s the other path for this firmware being related to the update?
Maybe I’m missing something
There are a few ways I can think of, such as coming from the factory with en engineering firmware, or a third party (manufacturer) tool pushing the update.
There’s also the question of how M$ would have even got the engineering firmware to begin with. If it did indeed get released through windows update, was it the manufacturer that provided it? M$ can’t really be expected to vet every driver they are provided.
