• SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fiber all the way, especially if it is owned by the community. That would simply ensure that Musk nor TelCos can’t fuck around with people. Fast speed, no data caps, low prices, and not being at the mercy of some wealthy jackhole would be wins across the board.

    Also, if America has a 2nd Civil War, fiber will be much more safe than relying on sats - those can be shot down, or worse, Musk can cut off the good guys from having internet. It is simply harder to sabotage if the wires are underground and cannot be readily seen by hostile actors. As seen in Ukraine, the fucker has absolutely no compunctions against disabling the internet at key moments.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      “fiber will be much more safe than relying on sats”

      Spoken like someone who has never had some idiot in a backhoe chop a fiber bundle…multiple times in a week.

      We have a saying in IT. Always carry a 1ft section of single-mode fiberoptic when hiking. If you ever get lost, just bury that sucker and some dipshit in a backhoe will be out there in a hour to cut it in half.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Nope. But I think it would faster and easier to replace all fiber with Starlink than it would to replace all fiber with fiber again.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m just trying to understand why this argument is even happening.

                You seem to basically agree with them. What’s even the point?