• HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Parents have the ultimate say-so of what their kids have access to.

    I don’t believe there needs to be a law that says that, no.

    If a parent decides their kid is responsible enough to have their own money, then it’s the parents who are to blame if that kid buys “bad” things with that money.

    Same thing online. If a parent decides their kid is responsible enough to have unrestricted internet access, then it’s their fault if the kid then goes to a “bad” website.

    It’s not the store’s fault. Nor is it the website’s fault.

    We have given away far too much of our parental responsibility over to 3rd parties, and now we don’t know how to parent anymore.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      So you would also support a child buying alcohol online on account of being given money and access to the internet?

      • HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Support? Absolutely not.

        Allow? Not my child.

        Make illegal? Nope. Not my business to tell other parents how to raise their children.

        And that’s exactly the problem here. People like YOU, who think that if I don’t want something illegal, than that of course means I like that thing, or that I personally want to do that thing.

        Nope. It has to do with personal autonomy. I’m not your boss, I shouldn’t get to tell YOU what you can do to yourself. Period.