• ruffsl@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Some poignant questions for these new platform requirements:

    • How do you anticipate this being used against journalists and advocacy groups?
    • What research and statistical quantification will be done to evaluate the amount of harm these restrictions can inflict?
    • What precautions or safeguards will users have against malicious state actors or capitulating corporations?
    • How can developers protect themselves from liable damages due to service interruptions caused by third party verification?
    • Do you foresee legal restrictions in rollout due to national security concerns from differing nation states?
  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Just today apple showed how stupid is this policy as they revoked the publisher certificate for a torrent app, proving that the end goal is not locking malware but stuff that they don’t like

  • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    This is just a way to capture negative feedback in a way that leaves you feeling like you did something while impacting none of their business which they can then ignore and throw away with no issues. Make noise on social media, not feedback forms. Make them hurt.

  • fuzzywombat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    What a disappointing week. I was looking to replace my five year old iPhone with an android phone and now I’m just stumped. Pixel 10 looked pretty good but then this sudden verification requirement news hit. Both platform are now equally crap. The hell with both of these shitty companies. Maybe I’ll go full retro and get a dumb phone instead.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Get a pixel secondhand and put an android fork on it. Its what I will likely do because I am sick of Google in my life and dont want to pay through the nose for a glossy shit that doesnt even have a file manager from apple.

      • wavebeam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        iOS/iPad OS has had a file manager for years? It’s not great, and heavily restricted, but it for sure exists.

        • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s not great, and heavily restricted, but it for sure exists

          That’s kind of the point though. Apple’s file manager portrays a “flat” filesystem, where all of your data is laid out neatly on the table - so to speak - and the actual locations of those directories within the system are buried inside vague and protected locations “for security”. Android file managers embrace a more traditional Unix-like filesystem hierarchy.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is silly. Google doesn’t give a single fuck. This decision will make money for key players and that’s the end of the conversation.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      It’s very likely that no amount of negative feedback will change anything. Why not waste some of their time anyway? Write to them, call them, spread the word. This is the only thing we can do. Even if it goes through regardless - at the very least we can make it as unpleasant as possible.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Their AI will be looking over all of the responses, not people. No important person at Google’s time will be wasted on this.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          That’s why keywords are important. For instance I added the fact that if they continue in this course I will seek to de-Google my phones.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Like I said in another comment, unless they get tens of millions of actual unique-not-spam responses they will not even consider reconsidering. People aren’t going to de-google in any great numbers from this, because most of the people this will affect are already de-googled.

            • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Rather than degoogling telling them you will go to Apple and opt for apple services is likely the more powerful response, since that is what the regular person is more likely to do. If degoogled is used they’ll likely dismiss it assuming it is just one of those niche nerds. But an exodus to Apple is a threat that is more realistic.

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                But that makes no sense - they’ll go to someone who is even more restrictive in side loading?

                Google won’t reverse this because there’s no alternative for the relatively few people this will affect. They already don’t use Google things, and Apple don’t accomodate them. They’ve got them by the balls and they know it, which is why it’s all just empty threats even from people in here.

                • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  The ones that don’t sideload obviously won’t care. But the ones that do are going to have little incentive to stick around if that was the main selling point for them, and the devs for non Google play apps leave because they don’t want to hand over info to Google.

                  At that point why not go to Apple if Android no longer delivers the type of sideloading experience they desire? Apple is more polished, has longer support, battery life, and better peripherals.

                  And those types likely will push family to move to Apple too if they are jumping ship, since they might be the ones overseeing tech support for the family anyways.

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Closing the side loading option is a path to antitrust suits, a slap in the face to privacy, a kick in the teeth to independent devs and personal use.

    There is zero reason for this other than wanting full control of how I use my own phone and how much money/data google can squeeze out of everyone.

    I did not purchase a phone to have it later be functionally broken as features it had have been stripped in the name of ‘security’.

    A warning message is all that is needed. The current toggle is enough.

    We are not toddlers.

    There are not possibly enough cases that it warrants such a restrictive policy aside from the stated reasons above.

    Give me liberty or give me symbian.


    How’s that?

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Public pushback on stuff like this does work on occasion. It even worked on Apple when they proposed upload filters for CSAM.

    Google’s intent in the short term probably is just about malware, but in the long term it gives them, and governments which can pressure them the ability to ban any app from nearly all Android devices. Once deployed, there’s a near 100% chance of such a mechanism being used for evil.

    • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      The malware argument falls like a house of cards when you just dig a bit nd see that Play Store is full of indiscutible malware like flashlight “apps”.

  • Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I couldn’t tell from the article, but does this impact ALL apps that do NOT go through the Google Play Store?

    What about 3rd party App Stores? Amazon has one, there is also the FOSS app stores like F-Droid. Are those in or out?