weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 5 months agoGiving up control bit by bitsub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square91linkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down10
arrow-up19arrow-down1imageGiving up control bit by bitsub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square91linkfedilink
minus-squarePsychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·5 months agoIf you give me a 1000 piece puzzle for free, but without the instructions or a box picture to go off of, you’ve done a nice thing by gifting me something but have also failed miserably as I’ll never fuckin solve that puzzle
minus-squareHawke@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-24 days agoI’m not gonna say “most” but plenty of people prefer to do puzzles without looking at the box picture. It’s part of the challenge. Alternatively “lol you can’t figure out how to solve a puzzle without looking at the solution? lol dumbass” It’s a terrible analogy anyway because software is not analogous to a puzzle.
minus-squareTetsuo@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoTerrible analogy honestly. Feel free to not use this software, nobody will ever force you to use it. This is not software to entertain you. It’s a tool that you don’t understand how to use and choose to blame the people building it for free.
minus-squarePsychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·5 months ago It’s a tool that you don’t understand how to use and choose to blame the people building it for free failing to properly document their tool. Ftfy Just because it’s provided free doesn’t mean you’re off the hook for not telling people how it works, dumbass
minus-squareqqq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoWhy so hostile and the name calling…? They’re saying it’s a lot of work for oftentimes a single person to do. That’s just the truth.
minus-squarePsychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·5 months agoYou’re a fantastic idiot if that’s what you actually think. That’s not what they’re saying nor relevant to the discussion at all
minus-squareqqq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoYikes. Not sure why I expected anything else.
minus-squarePsychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·5 months agoCuz you’re a moron
If you give me a 1000 piece puzzle for free, but without the instructions or a box picture to go off of, you’ve done a nice thing by gifting me something but have also failed miserably as I’ll never fuckin solve that puzzle
I’m not gonna say “most” but plenty of people prefer to do puzzles without looking at the box picture. It’s part of the challenge.
Alternatively “lol you can’t figure out how to solve a puzzle without looking at the solution? lol dumbass”
It’s a terrible analogy anyway because software is not analogous to a puzzle.
Terrible analogy honestly. Feel free to not use this software, nobody will ever force you to use it.
This is not software to entertain you. It’s a tool that you don’t understand how to use and choose to blame the people building it for free.
Ftfy
Just because it’s provided free doesn’t mean you’re off the hook for not telling people how it works, dumbass
Why so hostile and the name calling…? They’re saying it’s a lot of work for oftentimes a single person to do. That’s just the truth.
You’re a fantastic idiot if that’s what you actually think. That’s not what they’re saying nor relevant to the discussion at all
Yikes. Not sure why I expected anything else.
Cuz you’re a moron