I downvoted because I’ve seen this legitimisation of ridiculous candidates before and it only helps them. Even if the whole article is ridiculing the candidate, just having the headline and being in a proper newspaper aids them.
“There’s no such thing as bad publicity” and all that.
Not sure why you’re getting voted down for the article. Connor might be a bellend, but the article is good.
I downvoted because I’ve seen this legitimisation of ridiculous candidates before and it only helps them. Even if the whole article is ridiculing the candidate, just having the headline and being in a proper newspaper aids them.
“There’s no such thing as bad publicity” and all that.